IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
Accused now means Convicted - if you are OBAMA's brother
|
TOPIC: Accused now means Convicted - if you are OBAMA's brother
|
|
|
|
Accused now means Convicted - if you are OBAMA's brother 15 Years, 1 Month ago
|
|
www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/General+New...ed-Entry-To-UK-.html
Incredible that this story being carried by the BBC etc. means that anyone accused of a Ssxual offence in the UK would be denied entry - even if they were not charged and convicted.
The idea of INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY still seems to be missing from UK Justice even under the new COALITION.
This must be changed. This man should be allowed into the UK - where we have mass murderers coming in from other countries to LIVE here due to their human rights. Why has this man got no human rights at all ?
Very strange situation.
Maybe OBAMA will send the US Fleet to Dover.
|
|
|
|
 Logged
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
|
Re:Accused now means Convicted - if you are OBAMA's brother 15 Years, 1 Month ago
|
|
|
Apologies, Veritas, but I can't let you get away with that. Last time I checked GW Bush wasn't living here {and is that technically "life" anyway?}
The point remains that BR's contention, like those he made in connection with Hitler {a "socialist"}, the BNP {"the only party speaking up for the British working class"}, the EDF {"honest, simple working class lads who only resort to violence under extreme provocation}, a former PM {about whom he publicly made a statement which could have resulted in the prosecution of the owner of this website who wisely - and very quickly - pulled the thread carrying the accusation}, the double dip recession he claimed we were already in {figures out today prove that the world economy is actually recovering much faster than even the most optimistic of analysts predicted}, along with numerous promises of UFO revelations along with other "predictions" like the world being about to end {see the ridiculous "Five Years" references he never tires of making}... should I go on?... is claptrap, and all bear the hallmarks of someone who loves to think his finger is on the pulse yet is always wrong. You know, I know it, everyone here knows it. Only BR, it appears, doesn't.
Once again BR has made a bizarre statement which he claims is factual yet is borne out by no hard or credible evidence.
We have NO proven mass murderers living here "because of their human rights". At least none who have ever been subjected to the sort of rigorous and impartial system of justice which BR would extend to anyone white, middle class and British accused of such crimes. Remember who is one of the chief defenders of Gary Glitter on the grounds of "lack of a fair trial in a foreign court" here?
Our resident nutcase has made a huge statement. To ask for the evidence on which it is made is both sensible and understandable. And no amount of handwaving and evasion on his part is going to hide the fact that, once again, when called upon to back his statements {and note I repeatedly use the word "statements" because that's how they're always presented} he goes almost unaccountably quiet.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
