OK - so Obama has been a disappointment, but I still think he's head and shoulders above Mitt Romney.

There is something "dark" about him ... I sense he's a fundamentalist in the same way that the loony Bush was !
The kind of person who gives Christians a bad name !!!

In The Know wrote:
OK - so Obama has been a disappointment, but I still think he's head and shoulders above Mitt Romney.

There is something "dark" about him ... I sense he's a fundamentalist in the same way that the loony Bush was !
The kind of person who gives Christians a bad name !!!

Obummer's a bit dark too
Glad you enjoyed your holidays.

I think you have it backwards.

Romney is just an opportunist businessman who asset strips companies.

Obama has been thwarted by a hostile Republican dominated Congress that in classic Orwellian manner then turns around and blames him for not doing what he said he would.

but US politics is busted anyway.

Yes sadly I don't think a President (or a Prime Minister) makes any difference. But I'm for Obama; he's far better at media and that's all that matters.

True JK, as ever all that counts now in far too many moronic Junk Meeja-made minds is their false Glass God TV mainly owned and run by Fraud Market Repugnant Party Poopers posing as supposed 'Christians',

In fact Psycho-Christians at whom sweet Jesus weeps for what they do in his name. If he came back now they'd nail him up again as a goddam pinko socialist !

Carry On, narrow, shallow, hollow 'mass-perception, deception, eRection, detection, correction, ejection.

Junk Media Makes Junk Minds !

Ah, never mind.

[b]Glad you enjoyed your holidays.[/quote]

Thank you, dear - you'll have to come next time.
(Just fearing the arrival of Mrs ITK's credit card bill !)

In The Know wrote:
OK - so Obama has been a disappointment, but I still think he's head and shoulders above Mitt Romney.

There is something "dark" about him ... I sense he's a fundamentalist in the same way that the loony Bush was !
The kind of person who gives Christians a bad name !!!

... as I was saying !

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19637631

Reminds me of something that I saw on Twitter the other day:

If there was something of the night about Michael Howerd, there's something of the shite about Theresa May.

steveimp wrote:
If there was something of the night about Michael Howerd.


I wonder who is financing the Romney campaign ?

Here's a clue -

Romney said "the Palestinians dont want peace"

Only someone keen to keep the status quo(*) - ie illegal occupation and repression - could make such a stupid statement

(*) or an ignorant far-right Republican presidential candidate !

The Koch Bros are financing him along with other multi-millinaires. But then Obama is Wall Street's man so they win either way.

You are all wrong, Romney is fairly liberal but posing as an extreme right winger because that's what the now far-right Republicans demand. That's why he keeps putting his foot in it.

Actually he was fairly honest in his secret video and the comments were not that bad as he didn't say he was going to destroy welfare.

But the current Repubs do. They want more private prisons topped up to the max, they want work houses for cheap labour, no welfare or job protections, debtor's prison..the lot. That's why genuine capitalists are scared silly by them.

Hedda wrote:
Actually he was fairly honest in his secret video and the comments were not that bad as he didn't say he was going to destroy welfare.

... just hinted "very strongly" that he (as Pres) would do nothing to restore peace to the Middle-East, and gave the nod to the Israelis to simply carry on - (and bomb Iran? - starting WW3?).

You would think that the Yankers would do all they can to attract some friends in the East / Middle-East ... but .....

Weapons of Mass Destruction, anyone?
Oh ... forgot ... its building nuclear weapons this time isnt it LOL !

I'm no Romney supporter but would he be any different to Blair & co?

US presidents are just front men for vested interests and these days both sides are compromised by big money.

Hedda wrote:
I'm no Romney supporter but would he be any different to Blair & co?

US presidents are just front men for vested interests and these days both sides are compromised by big money.

B-Liar wasnt president of the USA (although he thought he was).

Agree with the rest, which is why I'm so concerned by the backers of Romney, and why he is making such bizarre statements (in order to please them).

btw - B-Liar's book "A Journey" (to Lining My Own Pockets) is turning up in charity shops everywhere !

In The Know wrote:
OK - so Obama has been a disappointment, but I still think he's head and shoulders above Mitt Romney.

There is something "dark" about him ... I sense he's a fundamentalist in the same way that the loony Bush was !
The kind of person who gives Christians a bad name !!!

Getting very close now ... too close to call?

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20190478

Hope everyone turns out to vote otherwise we could have a mormon in the white house !