the Mail has form here..but in this story they illustrated a story with an upskirt photo taken in a school of a schoolgirl.

there is no excuse in law for making a mistake. A 'sexualized' pic of an under aged teen is classed as child pron and in particular this article was about porn so it was clearly used in a provactive and sexualized manner.

Will Paul Dacre have his collar felt soon ?..If not, why not?

"Prurient Interest Pedophilia Sells Media " BIGtime!

The vastly overpaid Rothermere Whore Pee(DOH)Dacre should have his backstreet bollox felt & wallet nicked by one of millions of modern day DIY/Cellphone-C.P. cyber kids, brazen upskirt-downstairs Artful Dodgers & Dodgerettes.

That'll learn him about 'allegedly' fancying young gals & boys.

Case dismissed. Bring on the next Dickensian smut-case please.

JK, the guy replying to hedda's post is just incomprehensible and obviously someone posting under many different names on many topics. I post seldom but read the forums often. But this is seriously annoying. I know this must be a sensitive issue for you, but just kick him/her out. a filter in this case is not a bad thing...PS: unless this is a split personality that you've developed, and it's actually you posting! Still....i will bail out (regrettably)...

Yes I'm afraid I've pointed this out several times and it keeps creeping back; I'm in agreement - it gives me a headache and is incomprehensible. Future posts will have to be ditched even though many points are interesting.

"Many points are interesting " Thanks JK, what are ya drinking ?

Our modest aim is merely to info-tain with hopêfully 'On Topic' Entertaining-Informative facts and sometimes outrageous opinion.

For which there are numerous precedents in broad-church Brit literary and oral culture.

We of course apologise to those whose taste or cognitive abilities do not cotton to our sometimes satirical, cynical, skeptical, silly soundings.

Tho never having had the dubious honour/dishonour of being bottled-off the estimable Glasgow Empire 'war zone' stage, we do recall a Swingin '60s hairy Brit band naturally swamped by trophy-sex-keen, and pre-legal, schoolgirls. The band was an incongruous opening undercard for a heavy Rockin '50s revival headlined by alltime greats Gene Vincent & Jerry Lee Lewis-The Killer (1957 wed his 12/12 y.o. squeeze cousin).

The riotous venue was a late booking Golders Green Hippodrome with no programme on-sale, so among hordes of Teddy Boys n Rockers outnumbering all others while smashing & grabbing front-of-house posters from the glass frames, and then having endured too many bars of the sound of 'Chocolate Biscuit' or whatever the flowery flouncy beat-boyz were called, also with a daftly defiant drummer giving the Teds the V-sign with his sticks. One GIANT Ted-Rocker stood on the back of his Row Z seat and started a run-down riot from which the band barely escaped with their lives as jobsworths and Teds fought it out onstage.

"FOR CHRISSAKE FUCK OFF !!"

Like yo goodself we too have endured too much bent-Cops-Media (is there a straight-1?), and we do lurve a sense o’ fun & fairplay so take that worthy quote as a, thumbs-down then ?

old Hedda forgot to leave a link:

www.tabloid-watch.blogspot.com.au/

I can understand Propaganda !!