Doesn't look good does it? That documentary has started a whole lot of shit.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2213960...&action_ref_map=

certainly doesn't look good for the media who apparently all were utterly ignorant about rumours and blithely went on promoting JS and every BBC groper.

All sounds very plausible to me. What else would motivate her to make these claims? I'm sure a few intelligent folk on here would probably criticise her looks for want of a better argument...

And do you know, there was a "culture" in schools years ago to beat children on their bare bottoms?

Not only did this abuse go on every day, but everybody knew about it and nobody did anything about it.

Some even approved of it.

I think there should be a witch hunt about it. What's a grope compared to a smack?

Yes. But the real problem is the long succession of Secretaries of State for Education who presided over this scandal, and some of whom may now be dead. Time to investigate, shurely.

JK, Ur SO right.

And we've been saying that for SO long.

All but 'CRIMINALLY' ignored for decades ongoing unchecked by Sex-Obsessed phoney Anglophonia UK/US/CA/OZ/NZ/SA/IE/bent-media & authorities is that leading agencies (US Committe To Prevent Child Abuse/UNICEF/York University) have shown that a V-A-S-T 92% of Serious Child Abuse is N-O-N-Sex Serious Child ABuse.

All but 'CRIMINALLY' ignored by the aforesaid Sex-Obsessed phoney Anglophonia for sensation, greed/ratings/profit by Mass Deception -NOT for TRUE Child Protection.

Those same agencies also shame phoney Anglophonia perversely posing as best, yet are in fact 'Worst In The West For Child Wellbeing.

While coincidentlly with no sex-obsessed, sensationlist bent-media, mainland modern-EU is rightly named 'World Best For Child Wellbeing' - it's NO COINCIDENCE !

It's long overdue for phoney Anglophonia bent-media and authorites to be retrospectively severely prosecuted - for TRUE Child Protection NOT Mass Deception !

LoL.

Thanks FullFacts,

92% non-sexual. That's quite something, and well worth bearing in mind.

Also of interest is that 12,000 children under the age of ten die of starvation or starvation-related illness every day, on average, somewhere in the world, according to UNICEF.

Nobody in meejah-ville seems much bothered by that.

Best Wishes,
Jim

oh Angel you dear innocent and you are named so beautifully.

the sad fact is that people, ney even celebrities do say things that are not true and time distorts events.

Saying something, alleging something happened does not translate into it being the truth even as you qualify it with your statement.."why would she say it"?

I am living proof...I have claimed to be gorgeous, 29 and a virgin... they may titter behind their hands down at the boozer but I never see it.

But I believe it to be true.

Hi Everyone - just signed up and have to say what an absolute circus this has all become.

Hedda wrote:
oh Angel you dear innocent and you are named so beautifully.

the sad fact is that people, ney even celebrities do say things that are not true and time distorts events.

Saying something, alleging something happened does not translate into it being the truth even as you qualify it with your statement.."why would she say it"?

I am living proof...I have claimed to be gorgeous, 29 and a virgin... they may titter behind their hands down at the boozer but I never see it.

But I believe it to be true.

Its not just Kershaw, Veritas. I'm supposing as more celeb's who worked at the beeb come out you'll just assume they're on the bandwagon. I see no benefit to admitting that and please stop the sarcastic bile you've adopted since changing your name. JK, there have been numerous debates on tv/radio re JS, why don't you argue your side of the story? I'm sure you could give most a run for their money.

Nobody ever abused me Angel apart from the judicial system which convicted me of crimes that never took place, and nobody is interested in that. It's not a good story.

Mike Smith think she's exaggerating wildly too, and was apparantly talking to Richard Bacon this afternoon about it on 5live

mikesmithinlondon.blogspot.co.uk/?spref=tw

JK2006 wrote:
Nobody ever abused me

... or me - and I was an altar boy (in the Catholic Church) for three years !

Do you think it may have left me feeling rejected ? Can I sue ?