Jimmy Savile’s charity (Savile Trust) could change its name and give all profits to feminist lobby groups sex abuse charities. In other words, they’re not only lynching a dead man’s reputation, they’re stealing from his corpse to line their own pockets and to fund their fake child protection lobby groups..in order to campaign for yet more legislation that will criminalize even more men - dead or alive! :

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19863322

More names of celebs from the 60's and 70's (mostly dead men) are being bandied about. Was everybody at it?? Well, probably yes, if you mean banging the odd underage groupie. This was the era of sexual liberation, and age of consent laws were considered as Victorian, puritan and unfair as the illegality of homosexuality. Nobody gave a fuck!! Live with it you old jealous femi-hags! This historical revisionism is an attempt to airbrush from the past the objective truth that moral attitudes to teenage sexuality are completely relative. In another 100 years, hopefully sooner, when human beings are enhanced to be more intelligent, more beautiful, and to never age, people will look back at the repulsive old feminist savages who lynched dead men in the name of sexual jealousy like we look back today at the sexually repressed witch-finder generals of the middle-ages who found an outlet in burning innocent women (and men) to death at the stake.

www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-22143...ml?ito=feeds-newsxml

I wonder how far this feminist re-writing of history, these tabloid show trials of dead celebrities for what they did decades before, will go? Is it only ‘naff’ celebs like Jimmy Savile, Freddie Starr, Jonathan King who are legitimate targets? Or will they dare to go for the big guns - the likes of Elvis Presley etc. After all, everybody was likely at it - it was the perk of the job. Feminist pedohysteria has probably done more to kill the music industry than even pirating. Those men who manage to find fame and success in the pop world are, after all, almost by definition ‘ephebophiles’, with permanently adolescent souls filled with the longings of a perpetual youth, and an unrivalled and undiminishing ability to tap into the minds and musical tastes of teenagers.

Even the Beatles sang about 17 year old ‘children’ and made films in which they discussed bonking schoolgirls (A Hard Days Night). The BBC is already refusing to repeat television shows featuring Jimmy Savile. What if the likes of John Lennon gets ‘exposed’ and destroyed?

Prepare your sick bags - unless you’re a castrated mangina pedocrite of course. An old Guardinista bag informs men that ‘liking young girls is not a preference it is a perversion‘.

And she has control of your balls…and it’s not as if any ‘men’s rights movement’ (guffaw) is ever going to do anything on about it, is it?

theantifeminist.com/necrophiliac-lynchin...my-savile-continues/

Whoah, JIM - U nailed it dude !

Exhume and HANG all past good pedos like Rock God Prez nd many more, PLUS more than a few good Wimmin-peds - just to keep it fair & balanced for the femiNazi babes.


E.G. check Rockin '50s Brit BIG hit-film 'Saturday Night & Sunday Morning' to see those massed matriarchal mills where any young lad working there was whistled, groped, and much more in the good-old rights-of-passage days, back in the old back-passage, convenience; or wherever was convenient, OR inconvenient.

Bring it all on, and lets' have an even playing field, there won't be nuff cells for all those past-femme pedos.

On logic, not lies - they lose !

LoL.

Jim I would disagree that all this is a 'feminist' attack and I believe the greats of feminism like Germaine Greer , Betty Friedan etc are horrified how the movement they started has been hijacked by nutters.

most of what you say is correct.

And never forget..if all this chatter were true...every British tabloid and media outlet co-operated along with the BBC.

Jim would like to clarify that the article he cited and reproduced was not written by him. Indeed, no one as diminutive and uninventive as a mere "Jim" could possibly be expected to write an article like this. He merely offered it for the consideration of the group as an example of how not everyone is a paedohysteric nutcase trying to track down the evil perverts. Still, that's no reason not to check behind the sofa just in case.

Best Wishes,
Jim

Astonishing that, whilst the BBC was mired in the broadcasting equivalent of Satyricon, ITV, according to all of these hacks, was always a model of probity, with vicars guarding the corridors and nuns watching the dressing rooms. There should be more people coming out to celebrate how admirable ITV was throughout all those naughty years.

Just Yates wrote:
Astonishing that, whilst the BBC was mired in the broadcasting equivalent of Satyricon, ITV, according to all of these hacks, was always a model of probity, with vicars guarding the corridors and nuns watching the dressing rooms. There should be more people coming out to celebrate how admirable ITV was throughout all those naughty years.

indeed. Along with all those organs of repute such as the Daily Mail, News of The World, Radio Times etc who weekly promoted the BBC and stars such as ...errr, Jimmy Savile.

I never liked Jimmy Savile. I tolerated him on telly if I had to but, as with JK's own case, why is it no-one mentioned this years ago? If these issues WERE raised earlier and buried by the BBC, then, we need to look at the BBC and what else they've buried and why.

What's a paedophile? In the music business, it can be nothing more than a naive kid who thinks a predatory, starstruck, teenage girl is telling the truth when she says she's 16 because she wants a trophy boyfriend in a signed band. Later on, once she's become a middle aged feminist, she can play the victim and say she was abused.

This is all getting too stupid ... then you add in what we now know about coppers knowing if they can find and tell the press about a junkie rent boy nutter to say the reason his life's a mess is because he was poked by someone famouus 20 years earlier? It seems you really can build a prosecution on hearsay now. It's scary.

I was in some unsuccessful bands in my teens and even at that level, the attention and pure drivel I got from birds put me off the business with girls I didn't even know saying I was "hot in the cot" whilst I was still a virgin.

We need to get real about what some teenage girls are like.

As I have said elsewhere... the rumours/"info" on Hendrix, Page, Presley, various Stones etc have been around for donkeys years.

The main difference between those names and names like Gary Glitter, JK, Savile and even John Peel is those legends have a very valuable back catalogue & image(s), they are valuable commodities to the major multi-nationals. Those multi-nationals are the sponsors and advertisers of the newspapers, the commercial stations of tv & radio - and even of political parties. Fringe players, BBC DJ's and few-hit-wonders line nobody's pockets 'cept for their own and therefore are "fair game" for demonisation.

That is we won't see the "big" names in the papers, and we would quickly see "The Townshend Effect" if they do.

Nice condoning of Savile's rape campaign, people. Most of you sicken me.

I see no condoning at all JKCB; which illustrates how different people read different things in different ways.

JK'S Crystal Balls comment is quite illuminating.

As you say JK there isn't a soul on here "condoning of Savile's rape campaign" (odd choice of words)but many are questioning the lynch mob campaign surrounding these. as yet unproven claims.

As I have so superbly pointed out, the tabloids rushing to condemn the BBC etc are the very ones who promoted Jimmy Savile for decades, whether for good or bad so they share the blame whatever may happen.

But we can see just from one poster that Britain's tabloids have shaped thinking amongst the masses for decades.

If they say black is white and then visa versa...they scream agreement.

@JKCB Do you know something we don't? You mean Jimmy Savile went on a raping campaign and managed to hush it up? I'd contact the police with your evidence if I were you ASAP.

Jim wrote:
Live with it you old jealous femi-hags!

ITK nominates this as "Quote of the Month" !!!!

Would I be correct in thinking the one thing, apart all this bullshit, that links JS & GG is that they both probably had more friends/associates in the popular press that they did in the pop world/Radio 1?

The BBC should investigating all the cunts who worked from the tabloids in the 70s & 80s whilst the Met are pissing away public money investigating Ye Olde Fairy Stories