As many others who found her through this site, he's most impressed by the revelations of Anna Raccoon.

it must be in the print edition..however Miles Gosslet thinks otherwise :

www.spectator.co.uk/features/8743711/leveson-and-jimmy-savile/

and refers to Duncroft with the preposterous claim that the alleged witnesses back each other up means proof, something that is not always accepted in criminal cases for very good reasons.

Quite apart from the notion that if Raccoon is genuine and the Duncroft claims are proved false, the complainants will still probably get praise for 'exposing' Savile.

And why..does Goslett and basically every other journalist and poster in all these stories not mention Britain's tabloids active promotion of Jimmy Savile whilst claiming they knew all along he was bent?

They share as much blame as the BBC or anyone , if true.

The great masses are hypnotised by the Big Lie which is repeated over and over until those who deny it are burnt at the stake.

(not a great fan of Spectator- cannot abide Nick Cohen)

Link - it's the last half...

www.spectator.co.uk/columnists/rod-liddl...ambulance-at-a-time/

True JK, if somewhat different in tone and agenda to Rod's SUN columns.

Though Rod does make almost all the right points about the fine not-abused Ms Raccoon.

Pity Liddle, can't go that 'liddle' bit further and boldy ask in his Spectator AND SUN-columns what the media would make of the undoubted millions ongoing unchecked.

excellent yet he also confirms who ghastly Britain's combined hackery is and who now demand Lord Leveson allow them the freedom to continue in their dangerous ways.

They do not give us news anymore, they give us their opinions of the news.

My feeling is that Anna Raccoon is so on the ball, so correct and her version so accurate and provable that gradually journalists will want to be the ones who claim her for their own, first.