The difference between Jimmy Savile & Michael Jackson...There isn't one!

www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&...IZUZdGDulogI-Tx6XwxQ

They are trotting out that line again about Jordan Chandler giving an 'exact description of Jackson's gentilia.' He didn't. He drew a little triangle on the end of a pole. Just google it.

Sometimes journalists just recycle old rumours without researching them. Well it's so much easier.

And Jordan Chandler has since said that Jackson never abused him, hasn't he?

Though, when you look at it, it's a 99% certainty, if Jackson had of been British, he'd of almost certainly been put inside & what's more all throughout his case, he was supported & his records were still played....

" MICHAEL JACKSON’S DANGEROUS LIAISONS ", 2010.


“ The most engaging, informed, and generous-hearted book we have on the subject or are likely ever to have. I recommend this book strongly.”

Professor James R Kincaid, University of Southern California


"Vivid and insightful commentary is a joy to read."

Donald West, Emeritus Professor of Clinical Criminology, Cambridge University



".. a profound cultural critique of received assumptions about childhood innocence, pedophilic 'power', and parental goodwill."

Professor Thomas K Hubbard, University of Texas at Austin



“.. informative, original and humorous - yes humorous - commentary concerning a subject most of us feel uncomfortable about... quirky, well written, impeccably researched... Give it a try. You are NOT being disloyal to Michael by doing so.”

Hill Top House (Amazon)



“ the story... in all its larger-than-life drama and tragedy, with the pace of a natural storyteller. This book kept me gripped throughout... a nuanced, thoughtful analysis, backed by thorough research, and at the same time a roaringly good read.”

Vitaly (Amazon)


www.dangerousbooks.co.uk/

bh wrote:
Though, when you look at it, it's a 99% certainty, if Jackson had of been British, he'd of almost certainly been put inside & what's more all throughout his case, he was supported & his records were still played....

the US media treated Jackson and the claims as an 'oddity' but in a very real show-biz manner.

if Jackson had been British he would have been torn to shreds.

A silly article really especially coming from the publishers of Star Birds. (why aren't Star Birds in their 30s/40s if grown men don't want to shag young girls ? )

bh wrote, " The difference between Jimmy Savile & Michael Jackson...There isn't one!"

So true - BOTH INNOCENT !

Not proven guilty, of 'Pedophilia' nor of 'Child Abuse', 90% different things.


Bent-mainstream unreported for c. 90-yrs (since 16 was widely made an age of consent), is that 90% of 'Child Abuse' is non-sexual, and 90% of 'Pedophilia' is non-abusive.


Devious bent-mainstream all unreported.