From 2h.13m.19s thru 2h.17m.24s.

@2h.17m.0s: " False Allegations Are Very Rare ."


www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01r17y7

how would he know ?

no-one ever questions these people properly.

like the experts who claim abuse is everywhere...how do they know?

Not In De Nile wrote:
From 2h.13m.19s thru 2h.17m.24s.

@2h.17m.0s: " False Allegations Are Very Rare ."


www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01r17y7


Oh, the Savile 'case' must be one of these rare exceptions then, were true allegations appear to be 'very rare' (or non-existent)...

hedda wrote:
how would he know ?

no-one ever questions these people properly.

like the experts who claim abuse is everywhere...how do they know?


"like the experts who claim abuse is everywhere... how do they know?"

Probably because it's them that's doing it, or their making it up...

Tosspot and Judas Campbell are good mates.
The man is out of control.

Rare being the word, for anything truthful connected with Mr Williams Thomas! He must be a very close closet mate of David Icke. Some people don't believe in God. I don't believe in Thomas or Icke. Have they written their own Bibles, those two?!

Chris Retro wrote:
Tosspot and Judas Campbell are good mates.
The man is out of control.

I am sure that Mark Williams Thomas is well aware of many instances in history when false allegations have been made on a large scale, but chooses to ignore this.

Reading through his twitter, it seems to me that this man is dangerous.
On the one hand, he actually seems to be promoting paedophilia with his constant links to offensive sites and information that reads more like an advert....
Quote
Mark Williams-Thomas ‏@mwilliamsthomas

In cambodia over 30,000 children are involved in sexual exploitation, and where an 8yr old child can be rented for 3 days for around $30
End quote.

And on the other hand he seems to take delight in naming the accused without a thought for the impact it has on their children.
Why does Freddie Starr's daughter need no protection against the inevitable trauma that will follow from the publicity about her father being accused of a sex crime, yet middle aged complainants are protected?
He bleated the name of another accused man (not yet reported in the newspapers)who has a grandson aged under eighteen. This demonstrates that he doesn't give a fig about protecting children.

His latest 'tweet':
Finished for the day - back to London tmrow for a lunch about child sex exploitation & then Old Bailey for Tia Sharp hearing on Friday

"a lunch about child sex exploitation"???

Given this man has awarded himself these "child protection" accolades should people be demanding to know who the hell he really and what he has done to deserve these qualifications?
Should people really trust a man who left the police to impose himself, without portfolio, on society and embark on an obsession with child sex, seedy abuse and witch hunts? Who the hell is this bastard?

Chris Retro wrote:
His latest 'tweet':
Finished for the day - back to London tmrow for a lunch about child sex exploitation & then Old Bailey for Tia Sharp hearing on Friday

"a lunch about child sex exploitation"???

Given this man has awarded himself these "child protection" accolades should people be demanding to know who the hell he really and what he has done to deserve these qualifications?
Should people really trust a man who left the police to impose himself, without portfolio, on society and embark on an obsession with child sex, seedy abuse and witch hunts? Who the hell is this bastard?

I have no idea why he was allowed to muscle in on the Tia Sharp case. His input was a fat lot of good anyway! I dont understand what qualifies him as an "expert" on abuse, murder and abduction or why he has been allowed to talk tripe freely for years....

His views on what happened to Madeleine McCann were ridiculous and full of lies.
news.sky.com/story/599836/madeleine-my-theories-on-missing-girl

The Tapas bar was 131 yards away, not forty as he claims. The apartment was sealed off quickly, and his theory that an intruder never entered the apartment contradicts the "evidence" that Cuddle Cat was placed out of reach, and this is how they "knew" someone had been in.
As an ex policeman he must surely know how daft this sounds?