on Aussie program Q&A

According to GG Thatcher was chosen by men to implement highly unpopular 'reforms" (sell off of council houses, break-up of unions) and then when she had succeeded, discarded disgracefully.

Maggie had to go on lecture tours to make money ( no invitations to sit on boards) meanwhile her greatest disciple Tony Blair who has committed far worse war crimes than Thacher has become a multi-millionaire, if not billionaire.

Greer hardly 'defends' Thatcher.

Merely states yet another opinion about the most divisive of all postwar figures, who utterly failed in her May '79 mission statement to, "bring harmony where there is discord."

The young Margaret married into money, and in power with weak Tory men unleashed the beast of greed, in an undemocratic propaganda axis with the unelected media oligarch non-Brit Murdoch.

JK of course may not like to post such views now proliferating worldwide on The Peoples Web and elsewhere.

Truth Will Tell wrote:


JK of course may not like to post such views now proliferating worldwide on The Peoples Web and elsewhere.

Why do people think the posts are censored? It seems very unlikely to me, but so what if they are? You can do what you like on your own forum surely?

We don't allow malicious or nasty or libellous posts, Honey. And we don't allow posts that we don't understand from people-who-type in ODD styles that are mini-meaningless STRANGE and give me headaches!

Some who are unable to understand that think their views are being censored.

JK2006 wrote:
We don't allow malicious or nasty or libellous posts, Honey. And we don't allow posts that we don't understand from people-who-type in ODD styles that are mini-meaningless STRANGE and give me headaches!

Some who are unable to understand that think their views are being censored.

I am glad the posts are censored for decency and text speak. I wish all forums did the same.