I find the conman McCormick who sold millions of fake bomb detectors to loonies who bought novelty golf ball finders a splendid entrepreneur, and the stoopids who bought them and the pathetic BBC investigative reporters who couldn't even find a "victim" and interviewed real bomb victims instead are the losers.

How on earth can he be found guilty of conning people if they didn't test the damn things and bought them blind?

If someone sells me silent mp3's as music, who's the fool?

It reminds me of that daft case in the seventies when someone was sued for selling smarties as amphetamines.

perhaps not unlike blokes apparently "grooming" a teen who turns out to be a hard faced 40 year old vigilante or a middle-aged policeman....

a non-crime can becomes a crime.