The rumour I hear is that he went into the bedroom of the 9 year old girl and her brother to read them a bedtime story, she pretended to be asleep as a joke, he went over and tickled her and put his hand on her leg.
Can that really be the length and breadth of the assault?

If so, I think we really need to get our act together as society.

There might have been a mistake in the reporting but I thought the child was digitally penetrated?

JK2006 wrote:
The rumour I hear is that he went into the bedroom of the 9 year old girl and her brother to read them a bedtime story, she pretended to be asleep as a joke, he went over and tickled her and put his hand on her leg.
Can that really be the length and breadth of the assault?

If so, I think we really need to get our act together as society.

I agree completely. if the above is true and it is made public many people in the media would come to the same conclusion.

We already know that some of the offences are not what i would call crimes.
The whole thing is very puzzling.

It all started with an anonymous letter that Yasmin Alibhai-Brown claims to have received (and threw the envelope away)
Maybe I am wrong, but wouldn't the girl be over sixteen if she was invited to the BBC studios with a view to being employed there? It was around 1971. As far as I can tell, she was a gold-digging trollop and she regrets it now. I am very sorry that she is upset by it, but lousy relationships are not unusual.


From the letter....

So what was it that happened? The head and my mother accepted the invitation, and I went off alone to the studios. (Alone! What a green light that must have given him!) The first and then the second time, all was circumspect, public and above board. Then I was invited back again. It was the end of the working day, and Stuart took me to his dressing room, where he gave me plenty of champagne before having sex with me. (In his dressing room, in the BBC studios.) I still can't bear champagne and the memory of his crepey skin makes me shudder. And yet I went back for more. He took me to other places.


Why am I so angry? Because what he did was to spoil my sense of myself, my relationship with myself, my feeling of who I was for many years. His actions filled me shame and secrecy, and had a terrible effect too on my relationship with my mother.

He took advantage of my youth, naïveté, loneliness, and manipulated me into having sex. I didn't seek him out, he sought and groomed me. I didn't find him sexually attractive - quite the reverse - that crepey skin, the vanity, the perma-tan. But I craved what he gave me in other ways. Attention, and a sense of being wanted, something that was signally missing elsewhere in my life. And I felt then that he was affectionate with me. How it makes my skin crawl to write that. Sadly the world is too full of girls (and boys) who are looking for love, and find too late that they have found sex with a predator instead. These children are everywhere - not just in children's homes. What can we do to protect them from the Stuarts?

The full thing...
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/the-...stigate-8601824.html

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown's part in it....
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/how-...igation-8601517.html

"My relationship with myself"??? What a load of tosh.

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown : How I Saved Western Civilization (but they still won't give me a full-time job on the Indie)

Stuart Hall's niece tells how he groped her and leered at her.
www.mirror.co.uk/news/stuart-hall-relati...ophile-tells-1883978

MCR Media wrote:
Stuart Hall's niece tells how he groped her and leered at her.
www.mirror.co.uk/news/stuart-hall-relati...ophile-tells-1883978

Why would he want to touch her chest at 8?

MCR Media wrote:
Stuart Hall's niece tells how he groped her and leered at her.
www.mirror.co.uk/news/stuart-hall-relati...ophile-tells-1883978


"On one occasion “Uncle Stu” terrified her by begging to be let in when she went to the bathroom and locked the door."

perhaps he needed to pee.

so undignified...nothing brave about these people who crave attention vicariously even by associating with a "pedo uncle"

no thought for her other relatives...nothing brave about speaking to a tabloid...just wallowing in the gutter.

Still....Max Headroom correctly predicted the future...everyone is a star of their own reality show

hedda wrote:
MCR Media wrote:
Stuart Hall's niece tells how he groped her and leered at her.
www.mirror.co.uk/news/stuart-hall-relati...ophile-tells-1883978


"On one occasion “Uncle Stu” terrified her by begging to be let in when she went to the bathroom and locked the door."

perhaps he needed to pee.

so undignified...nothing brave about these people who crave attention vicariously even by associating with a "pedo uncle"

no thought for her other relatives...nothing brave about speaking to a tabloid...just wallowing in the gutter.

Still....Max Headroom correctly predicted the future...everyone is a star of their own reality show

Most of what that woman is saying is very vague and open interpretation, she's obviously decided to tell that story to the paper for no other reason but money...

MCR Media wrote:
Stuart Hall's niece tells how he groped her and leered at her.
www.mirror.co.uk/news/stuart-hall-relati...ophile-tells-1883978

Didn't Arthur Mullard do the same to his daughter who he stated in his autobiography she has mental illness ?

MCR Media wrote:
Stuart Hall's niece tells how he groped her and leered at her.
www.mirror.co.uk/news/stuart-hall-relati...ophile-tells-1883978

So she wasn't actually groped?
It is the intent that makes it a grope or not. A touch on the knee can be a sexual advance or a friendly "Chop chop, time to go" and it is difficult to hug without some part of a body brushing against breasts.

Sounds too much, like the Jimmy Savile tales. So it must be rubbish.

Amazing how things can be hyped up. Stuart Hall is a total shot away nutcase, for pleading guilty in the first place.

Now if only Mr Savile was still alive. Three things may of happened:

1) None of this would of dared to have been mentioned
2) It would of been quashed by his lawyers
3) MWT would still be a cowardly arsehole (No change there!)