The "victims" are suing the charities that ran the school.

From the Mirror...


QUOTE



By Justin Penrose
1 Comment

Jimmy Savile's Duncroft school victims set to sue Barnardo's and Mind
12 May 2013 16:17

Radio Luxembourg is also facing legal action from two victims
Many of Jimmy Savile's victims are suing Many of Jimmy Savile's victims are suing
Getty

Jimmy Savile sex abuse victims are preparing to launch legal action against Barnardo’s and Mind after being abused at a girls’ school run by the ­charities.

The charities have received legal letters from alleged victims at the Duncroft approved school, Surrey, where the first claims against the DJ surfaced last year.

One woman claims she was abused between 1976 and 1980 when it was run by Barnardo’s and three others say they were molested between 1973 and 1976 when Mind ran the school.

Victims from Duncroft ­previously described how Savile sexually assaulted them after being allowed to stay overnight by the headmistress, who was not aware of any abuse.

A spokesman for Barnardo’s said: “We are assisting Surrey Police with their current ­enquiries but cannot comment on individual cases.”

Lawyers acting for two victims have written to Radio ­Luxembourg, where Savile worked between 1958 and 1967, telling of their intention to sue.

There are also claims against the BBC, the NHS and the estate of the ­disgraced presenter, who had 450 victims.

www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-savi...hool-victims-1884599

Disgusting; you're quite right Honey; they are trying to get money out of charities that will therefore, if they are successful, be unable to help children!

And society and the media can't see this?

and why not the NSPCC for nor preventing all this ?

afterall none of their loot goes to charity so no loss there.

money will bring this house of cards down.

There is one connection played down here - this one one leading Children's Charity vs another.

This is not an attack on Jimmy Savile, the BBC and society in general - this is a staged battle by the NSPCC on Barnados.
He's a master tactician that former vice chariman of the NSPCC, y'know.

NO. The authorities are not writing to Radio Luxembourg, because it no longer exists, as such. Abeit RTL (the owners in Germany).

Even the Mirror talks bollocks. Were all the pupils at Duncroft, chancers? I think so. They can't prove a thing to get monies from non existent no evidence Court cases, so they try & sue every other outlet...How do you sue without proof? If you have an accident, you need proof & the accident needs to have been put in the accident book. In this case, there's no proof of abuse & nothing was ever recorded. Sue? How?

I also forgot another important point.

Jimmy Savile didn't work at Radio Luxembourg until March 1960. Where does this 1958, come from?

How can they due a radio station that doesn't exist anymore? Even the Internet era Radio Luxembourg has closed.

bh wrote:
NO. The authorities are not writing to Radio Luxembourg, because it no longer exists, as such. Abeit RTL (the owners in Germany).

Even the Mirror talks bollocks. Were all the pupils at Duncroft, chancers? I think so. They can't prove a thing to get monies from non existent no evidence Court cases, so they try & sue every other outlet...How do you sue without proof? If you have an accident, you need proof & the accident needs to have been put in the accident book. In this case, there's no proof of abuse & nothing was ever recorded. Sue? How?

I agree. This is ambulance chasing lawyers trawling as well.

Hack lawyers tell these deluded woman they'll sue for no upfront fee but that's only when they are 100% sure they can win....they won't even make a phone call without being paid.

I hope JK is correct and Savile's heirs fight the claimants. the alleged victims will cop the legal fees if they can't prove their case (10 years down the track)

And C.Retro is correct...charities staking claims for a shrinking market and donation base.