A story worth reading by all those convinced of Stuart Hall's guilt.

Not only Stuart Hall.....

JK2006 wrote:
A story worth reading by all those convinced of Stuart Hall's guilt.

This is exactly the situation that you were explaining about isn't it?

After 30 years of the 'CRIMINAL' Compensation-Culture.

Here's the headline and full expose that the world awaits:

" VICTIMS Of Historic CRIMINAL LIES, Need B-I-G COMPENSATION Payouts "

Spot on Honey; I just had tea with Bob Woffinden who could not believe this and has taken the link; an incredibly valuable precedent for anyone considering Pleading Guilty to a crime they did not commit.

Thanks for finding and posting it Jim.

Watch the National British Media pick this up and put it on their front pages - NOT! That's what's wrong, Leveson, not silly hacking scandals.

Could not agree more, JK

But, I would just point out - just that - the reported mental state of the man

Perhaps it make no difference.....

JK wrote:

Thanks for finding and posting it Jim.

It's a pleasure, Jonathan King. A pleasure! I'm glad to be of service.

I remember reading about your case years ago in the press. I was never convinced by it. I always found the paedohysteria to be a witch-hunt, and a potentially quite terrifying one.

I've long felt that from your point of view you may well suspect me of being a media plant, and why not? Perhaps it's futile, but let me assure you I'm not. I have my reasons for being here and following this site and they are personal not professional.

Sorry if that seems inappropriate, but I just felt like saying it now.

Best Wishes,
Jim

and note many many accused during the Operation Ore say they pleaded guilty or accepted cautions because they couldn't face the relentless onslaught from the media which becomes quite repulsive in their ruthless attacks with faux 'experts' and so on.

(small example : the ghastly Mark Williams-Thomas bullying of a barrister who calls for some sanity and then when he is criticized- his indignant "I am entitled to an opinion" retort)

Today we see an innocent man murdered by someone who it's claimed is obsessed with 'pedos': how much blame can be placed on the media's daily hysteria about "pedos"..

JK2006 wrote:
an incredibly valuable precedent for anyone considering Pleading Guilty to a crime they did not commit.

This also helps put the Michael Jackson allegations into perspective.

He was heavily criticised for having paid compensation while denying any wrong-doing.

BUT what rich man would NOT pay (what to him was pocket money) in order to GUARANTEE not going to jail ?

Good Jim wrote, "...you may well suspect me of being a media plant, and why not? Perhaps it's futile, but let me assure you I'm not."

Good Jim, any so called professional cop or media 'plant' here, will soon get weeded out and trashed, 'til they wished they had a proper job.

SuchGoodTolerance wrote:
Good Jim wrote, "...you may well suspect me of being a media plant, and why not? Perhaps it's futile, but let me assure you I'm not."

Good Jim, any so called professional cop or media 'plant' here, will soon get weeded out and trashed, 'til they wished they had a proper job.

But what could they possibly be looking for? Everything posted on here is public.

I think my fear was the suspicion could be they are here to illicit a response of an exaggerated kind which could then be published to put the board and its progenitor in a bad light. Anyway. Never mind. This is the kind of hole, the more you try to get out the more you dig yourself into it.