cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
After The Brits 2014 (if you care)
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: After The Brits 2014 (if you care)
#111597
After The Brits 2014 (if you care) 11 Years, 3 Months ago  
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#111607
Mike Willis

Re:After The Brits 2014 (if you care) 11 Years, 3 Months ago  
Is that actually any need to have a host Jonathan, surely if they had a voice-over man/woman announcing awards, then there would be more time to have more music on the show.

It has become a very boring show.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#111617
Re:After The Brits 2014 (if you care) 11 Years, 3 Months ago  
Which is exactly what I did as Producer Mike - the brilliant Simon Bates did voice overs and we got in an extra 30 minutes of music. Now That's What I Call Sensible.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#111651
GG

Re:After The Brits 2014 (if you care) 11 Years, 3 Months ago  
A celebration of British Music with two Americans...Beyonce giving a milquetoast forgettable performance and Katy Perry yell-singing off-pitch(badly).

Why not place the Brits critics choice kids front and center on-air instead? Sam Smith Chloe Howl.

At least the Brits hold it to 2 hours on-air. Has anyone sat in audience through a 4-hour Grammy show? Not fun, and no dinner before.

I wasn't at the Brits this year as I usually am, however, It's 2 hours of backslapping, glad handing, and waiting for the parties to start. I did enjoy seeing the brilliant Nile Rodgers. I thought Kylie should have joined them at the end, her being the biggest dance diva in British music. She did later at the Savoy.

No Jarvis moments.

The Grammys are worse JK. Ken Erhlich has his head completely up his ass. Beyonce doing a sex act at 8pm while kids are watching and Pink doing a circus act that has zero to do with music, and the "Grammy moments", putting disparate acts together to create magic that never happens i. e. Taylor Swift singing with Stevie Nicks, showing just how great Nicks is and completely exposing Swift. Its not brain surgery. There's no common sense.

I don't know what the answer is but they should definitely consult you for next year's Brits JK.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#111673
Re:After The Brits 2014 (if you care) 11 Years, 3 Months ago  
Spot on as usual GG - except I don't think The Brits should only concentrate on British music - their awards and exposure should be for GOOD music, even if it comes from Iceland (it has, a couple of times)!

As Producer I even looked at performing abilities - if someone wasn't good live, I wouldn't let them perform their huge hit but used a bit of the video. Remember No Limits? We often had music on by DEAD artistes (again, to the fury and hatred of major labels)… setting the track to Jenny and Tony fooling about or whatever.

My music choice was only ruled by one thing - was the music good? Other producers use the old "can we do it visually?" reason to book artistes.

First - is it good music? If so, how can we make it entertaining visually, even for the majority who will hate that kind of music. If I can get them to stay tuned because they are laughing or crying or hypnotised visually, they may decide they love the music they thought they hated, and go and buy it.

Am I mad? I seem to be so out of step with the majority in so many ways and always have been. Yet this kind of thinking is so obvious to me.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#111682
Mike Willis

Re:After The Brits 2014 (if you care) 11 Years, 3 Months ago  
It is obvious Jonathan and it is quite sad that people involves with this are believes it is good entertaining TV. (Re:- your letter to BRITS, having the Pointless guys do something would be very interesting).

Why can't they ask for your opinion/expertise on the BRITS? If they are worried about your conviction, they could keep your involvement anonymous. Whatever the reason, they are cutting their nose off to spite their face.

The whole point of the awards is designed to help the music industry, yet it hasn't for years and the fact two million less people watched this years BRITS, indicates to me that something needs to be done.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#111706
Re:After The Brits 2014 (if you care) 11 Years, 3 Months ago  
Yes I suggested this when Pointless started… "here's your question - first texted correct answer wins £500 - who won Best Male in 1973…" type thing - but the BPI now has cloves of garlic hung around its neck against all JK correspondence.

I don't blame the BPI or the Chief Execs - like most of the public, they are all wankers; dull, uninspired, cautious, lacking talent, imagination, ruled by self protection…

They always were. That's why they gave me The Brits in 1990 - terrified in being connected to a fiasco. Not because they thought I'd do any good… self protection.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#111708
Re:After The Brits 2014 (if you care) 11 Years, 3 Months ago  
Yes - 4.6 million viewers? In my era - 12 million viewers.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#111709
NCS

Re:After The Brits 2014 (if you care) 11 Years, 3 Months ago  
... dull, uninspired, cautious, lacking talent, imagination, ruled by self protection…

Sounds like you're talking about the artists
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply