IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
FAB Chart - to boldly go where others fail to Glitter
TOPIC: FAB Chart - to boldly go where others fail to Glitter
|
|
FAB Chart - to boldly go where others fail to Glitter 16 Years, 9 Months ago
|
|
The main talking point for this week's chart will no doubt be the inclusion of Gary Glitter at Number 20. Will any other charts dare to acknowledge an interest in his music? Well .. the Fab Chart does say "Putting music first", and it looks as though they are living up to that. 'Through the Years' is a good song.
I also wonder if the people who object to his inclusion will click the link to listen to the song - out of curiosity? It will be their choice alone.
Other new entries include Jackson Cook at 3 with a song about hurricane Katrina. Well crafted and delivered.
Jillian Goldin at 12. Wow! This has a real good atmosphere. Hauntingly beautiful.
Holes and Hearts are a teen duo with a kind of metal ballad called 'Are we done yet?'. I like it, and I think Kurt Cobain would have too.
King Lover 1t 17. No, not a lover of JK (I think). I found this a bit like one of the more weird auditions at the X Factor. His voice goes all over the place, but it shows an amazing range. It takes some getting used to but there is a touch of quality in there among the chaos.
2nd week at Number One for Carlos Bertonatti.
Indian Summer drops to 4.
Detox Cute climb to 6.
Some very good sounds.
http://fabchart.tripod.com
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:FAB Chart - to boldly go where others fail to Glitter 16 Years, 9 Months ago
|
|
Al wrote:
I seem to recally you emerged once before to post some unfriendly comment. I have to ask, why bother? If you find the Fab chart so crap, just ignore it and go do something you enjoy. Some of us appreciate this method of finding out about about new songs and artists. Any enthusiam for music is cool and should be encouraged.
I recall that a couple of weeks ago, maybe due to holiday, Cat didn't bring us any Fab news, so he doesn't do it entirely without fail. But thanks Cat for keeping us up to date. Don't give up just because some moaning old sod doesn't see the point.
+1
If you don't like it there is no compulsion to read the thread - they're always obviously about the FAB chart and pretty easy to avoid.
@Cat - Thank you 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:FAB Chart - to boldly go where others fail to Glitter 16 Years, 9 Months ago
|
|
The Cat wrote:
My interest is that I find it interesting.
As followers on this forum know, initially both I and Zooloo used to post updates on the FAB Chart - which is 2 years old not 5. As we both tended to clash it ended up with just me doing the updates. I can't quite recall how that came about, but such is where we find ourselves today.
All music is relevant to the music industry. An I-pod helps people to hear music they like. The FAB Chart helps people discover new music. It only takes one person to hear a song and like it and pass it on to another who then passes it on to several others - music "sharing". I've certainly done that. I've even bought CDs by some of these irrelevant artists.
I enthuse about the FAB Chart because it is different and it showcases new talent. Maybe only approx 14500 people have visited the website, but - as I said before - people pass things on. Word gets around.
It's all fairly straight forward - for those who don't want to intentially complicate things.
Certainly, if JK wants me to stop doing FAB Chart updates on his site, I will. Nobody is obliged to read my posts or to visit that website.
IRC you'd posted the FAB chart first which is where I heard about it and for a time we did both post about it.
Initially you weren't as prompt as you are now that you got into the swing of it and in the "gap" I posted but after a couple of weeks worth we began to clash and I felt my post was the secondary one and redundant, so I stopped (I think at the time I stated this)
I posted and visit because it's an interesting and amusing chart. It has always provided an interesting diversion. Nobody has every claimed it is wildly significant. It's simply always given a wide mix of songs, some new some pleasant reminders (Some not so pleasant too  )
If anybody finds it drivel and/or pointless the clue is in the tread title - it's the "FAB chart" bit that kind of gives it away. If you don't like it don't read it. It's not rocket science.
Why anyone would take against this I don not know.
If Cat has an "interest" in posting the chart so what. He hardly gains from it and even if he did this is the Tipsheet and tips, personal or otherwise, are welcomed.
I appreciate the time Cat gives to summarise the chart and will look forward to Cat's post on next weeks chart... and the next... and the next...
In the immortal words of Richard Dawkins - if you don't like it you can fuck off.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|