IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
Top of the Pops - why it fails...
TOPIC: Top of the Pops - why it fails...
|
|
Re:Top of the Pops - why it fails... 16 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
Mike Willis wrote:
I'm right in thinking Lisa Maxwell presented the 1st Series, I know Jenny Powell and Tony Baker presented subsequently after that.
Would still like TOTP to return, as we do miss a prime-time music show? Jools Holland is the only show (I think Channel 4 now have a satellite channel devoted to Music) on the main channels which showcases music.
You're the first person to mention what I recall - No Limits had different presenters for the first series! I'm also sure it was at the very end of that series that a Rolls Royce appeared and there was JK himself! Just wish my family had a video at that time since I would had taped them all and no doubt still enjoy them today.
As for today's charts, they've become too splintered not helped by music stores adopting their own charts and giving almost zero shelf space to singles.
We have been discussing here on this forum about new ways and methods to keep pop music retail and the charts alive. How about THIS idea?
Every region have their local heroes - bands who do well on the live scene and probably selling downloads. I think the answer may lie in becoming more localised. How about a football league type table scheme? A couple of leagues are created for each region and points are awarded for gigs and sales. The more popular bands end up in a premier league.
That "premier league" in all the areas is then combined to create a national premier league from which one can see and hear just who is really popular.
Of course this is just a basic idea and I'm not sure just how feasible or practical it could be, but given the current state of affairs I think there could be some validity in such a scheme. It would give new talent a chance to be seen and heard based upon their popularity but in a new way...
What I fear is this - all the acts who were lucky to be discovered and made into stars by the dying music corporations - Britney, U2, Brooce, Radiohead, Coldplay etc are guaranteed a lifetime of work and sales. Newer acts are not in such a position to get themselves established on such an National level so I fear a few years down the line, all the "established" names who already have their money and following will get all the work and sales but newer and original talent won't.
There is much much more to music than Britney and X Factor pap. Most people I talk to cannot stand them and wish there was something better, yet the music they listen to, consume and maybe buy isn't getting through... so Britney continues to get prime time TV slots miming badly and tossing off songs that are merely "Britney by numbers"...
As for Jools Holland... said it before and will say it again... it's just not enough. The only acts they'll feature are... yep... established ones, preferably signed to major companies. I find it bland, predictable and sycophantic. It's NOT the show I want to watch because I want to see something new - some NEW unknown talent, not bought onto the show thanks to a record company budget and marketing campaign. No wonder the dying majors just LOVE Jools, but I don't think that show accurately reflects just what really IS popular right now because of that bias.
I LOVE pop music. It's important to me, but I fear it's no longer "important" to more modern day teens. Naturally, I'm extremely concerned for the future of it. Fact is, we ARE in a major depression right now and heaven knows how long it's gonna last, but history has proved in depressed times, people want and need entertainment, but how is it gonna work? The entire structure needs shaking up from the bottom to the top.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Top of the Pops - why it fails... 16 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
It's ironic now that the album charts is deemed more important than a No 1 single. And you're right Elliott, the charts have become so predictable and in HMV etc.. only the X Factor song is getting any shelf space.
More often the deemed simple ideas are the best and the V festival (one I attend annually) have a competition where a local band gets an opportunity to perform on the Channel 4 stage on both days. This on some occasions, leads to bigger and better things, so yes I certainly think that your idea has a lot of mileage in it and one that would draw ratings if it is on at an appropriate time.
I enjoy the Jools Holland show, but it doesn't feature new or up and coming acts. More recently it has featured Duffy, Seasick Steve, Ting Tings and Adele before they became famous, but it could be argued that the BBC Sound of Music Best Acts/Brits, showcased them before.
We really do need a prime-time music show, otherwise the charts will be no more very soon.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|