IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: My solution for 2009
|
|
Re:My solution for 2009 16 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
I DON'T think the KEY lies in retail.
I believe the key lies in the experience of enjoying the music / entertainment - not how it was acquired.
Mrs Stretch had 2 tickets to Take That for Xmas - bought on the interweb. In fact - we didn't even get any tickets - I had to make some to wrap up! It's the same with CD's, Downloads, dvd's etc. People want the experience of watching, or listening. The purchase isn't really part of the pleasure any more ...
I think artists need to retail off their own site. The chart people will then have to get a feed from those sites in order to REALLY represent what's actually being purchased (rather than what is being purchased in a small number of retailers - as it is now). The artist (and team) can then supply as much of a buying experience as they can - by offering their customer as many extras as possible - and building a relationship with their fan. To me it's just a logical approach as the artist (and team) are the best people to present their offer in the way in which they want it presented ...
The record label then needs to become the complete support team for the artist - acting as management, marketers, web maintenance, admin etc. etc. The artist and 'record label' (we'll have to think of a new name for this support team) then work together to fully exploit all avenues of the artists work (retail sales, live performances, merchandise, publishing etc.) and share the profits.
Record labels (as they were) are all over now. And retail stores (as they were) are all over too (apart from specialist/hard to find/deleted/vintage etc. retailers. And distributors / aggregators etc. need to find something else to do.
Just my opinion ....
Stretch

|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
A very modest proposal 16 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
OK, here - strictly as a layman - are my thoughts.
(a) Music stores to follow the Argos model as well as the Apple one. By this I mean somewhere you can go where all the CDs are kept behind the desk - so that impulse buyers don't have to negotiate their way through bottleneck alleyways of CDs - and you just order them on the terminal at the front or, more crucially, you can download tracks directly onto your mp3 player.
(b) Unlike Argos, though, they need to be places that people want to come to, where they can hang out. Something like Waterstones or Borders was originally meant to be but with music - events, happenings, coffee mornings even for those who want them. Somewhere where music is available rather than sealed off for security reasons.
(c) For those of us in the minority, still buying CDs, what about making them all the same affordable mid-range price - say, £8? That would encourage casual buyers to delve deeper into the store, try new things, take chances which they can't necessarily take if CDs cost £14-15 a throw, and thereby do more to actively promote new music.
I'm sure there are many sound economic reasons why any or all of the above can't happen but businesses collapsing for fear of embracing the new isn't exactly sound economics either.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:My solution for 2009 16 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
There are no impulse buys if a customer has to make orders.
Argh, yes, I realised the paradox approx. one second after I submitted my post *dunce's cap MC MC check your posts before you actually post them*...
The thing about major record shop chains is that they seem intrinsically hostile to what used to be known as the "customer experience."
I went to my local Zavvi last week to look for sale bargains and it was a total mess - lots of misspellings of browser markers and misfiling of CDs, items still being sold at full price (why?), and an environment which could charitably be described as dead.
But if you go into your average HMV you're immediately faced with a bottleneck of people milling about at the front because of stacks of loss leader DVDs and Guitar Hero boxes.
To attract impulse buyers it's ridiculous to price potentially interesting items out of their comfort zone and confine discounts to the same, boring got-to-get-rid-of-it stuff (stock oldies compilations, overhyped/overstocked pseudo-indie underperformers) that we've all heard a thousand times before.
Clearly DVDs are now vastly outselling CDs and there's not much anyone can do about that but I do think there's still a viable, if substantially reduced, CD market which shops would still do well to optimise.
As a regular Rough Trade Shop customer I'm a bit baffled as to what they think their specialist market is at the moment - again, the stock seems to be all over the place and priced way too high. If I have to choose between paying £50 in Rough Trade for three potentially good CDs and a total of £10-15 for the same ones in Music & Video Exchange a couple of months later then, as the parlance goes, it's a no brainer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|