Home Forums |
Charts based on SoundScan irrelevant? What's next: Pop-I?
TOPIC: Charts based on SoundScan irrelevant? What's next: Pop-I?
|
|
Charts based on SoundScan irrelevant? What's next: Pop-I? 15 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
There is a interesting article on the Tunecore-blog about Soundscan / the traditionell methods of measuring popularity / success:
Should a band that sells 500,000 songs in one month spread across multiple releases be thought of as less successful than a band that sells 50,000 copies of an album in one month? What about gig and merchandise income? According to Soundscan, Bruce Springsteen and U2 are not “best selling” artists (they categorize them as “catalog”), yet in one night, they generate more revenue than many of the current Top 40 artists. And the new fad right now for labels is the “360 deal” where the label generates revenue from things outside of album sales.
And what about the arbitrary concept of looking at a weeks worth of sales, why not a days, or a months, or a years? Things are moving much faster. More music is being recorded and released. Music buyers are moving faster too. Seems to me that the age-old concept of weekly album sales has lost its relevancy.
It’s time to get a new system that more accurately reflects the new “IT” - and this time, its important not to consolidate the power of the reporting into the hands of one company.
blog.tunecore.com/2010/01/neilsen-says-t...are-a-majo.html#more
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|