IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
The actual awards must be the worst-looking things around. They look like something Mr Pooter had a go at improving with enamel paint. Even the name 'Brit' is horrible. It's like awarding someone a 'Yank'. Good enough at a masturbation awards show, but otherwise just as bad. A new name and a new award, prnto.
I named them The Brits in 1990 because they needed a catchy name (I think they used to be The British Rock and Pop Awards!) and it stood for British Record Industry Trusts Show.
JK2006 wrote: I named them The Brits in 1990 because they needed a catchy name (I think they used to be The British Rock and Pop Awards!) and it stood for British Record Industry Trusts Show.
It makes perfect sense as a name, and it certainly works brilliantly internationally. I just hate it whenever anyone calls me a 'Brit'. That's just my problem! I wish the show was on the Beeb, ITV make a shambles out of everything these days.
You should well design it JK. I was at the show Tuesday night and one thing may be to get rid of the dinner on the arena floor part of it. There was much stumbling around the dinner tables when taken into account you have to get the thing on live TV and right soon.
The Adele snub blunder was crazy seeing Damon rambled for near 4 minutes!
The Chairman should call Ken Ehrlich (sp) and see how to produce a first class nationally televised music show logistically. The Grammys are like the military.
The show was clearly rushed. It can certainly improve. I thought James did a great job doing his thing.