After a nice lunch with Louis I was quite full so decided on a snack dinner; Welsh Rarebit with bacon and sausages and toast with a chicken pate I'd bought in Paris - it was delicious but I felt did not require a photo!

So I guess this means LT is making a documentary about you?
Are you not worried it will only paint you in a bad light?...like that awful one done years ago by that moron.I cant remember his name but he was the same guy who did one on David Icke and kept saying The jeeeeeewzzz! every two minutes. Total clown.

You had your career and reputation ruined and despite your claims that you were cleared of everything...you have NOT been cleared as far as the press and public goes...no apology no nothing. If you are due one...then you need to be sure and get it...and get it LOUD AND CLEAR.

Theroux has a somewhat annoying habit of coming across dumb towards everyone he interviews..but he is NOT.He will stand there and pretend to look all worried and confused and then ask some totally daft question....sometimes its quite amusing..like with the alien channeling guy....

But in your case.... This is some serious issues.

Hope this won't backfire on you ..cos I tend to beleive you are less of a dirty pervy than people see you....

I will say one thing however.....there are far too many posters on here who are PRAYING you are just that so they can justify themselves.
This I know for certain. Holocaust21 being the prime example. Go look at his blog.

You seem to have put two and two together and make five Alex. And whilst all contributors are welcome, please don't denigrate other posters.

As an FYI JK I don't know if you have seen it but Louis Theroux once made a documentary entitled - I believe - "Where they put the paedophiles". It seemed a rather one-sided documentary where he visits the US and makes them all sound like horrible perverts whilst he conveniently ignores the human rights violations (keeping them locked up indefinitely without due process) and the fact that many "sexual predators" are guilty merely of kissing a 15 year old girl or asking her out on a date over the internet. Not to mention the fact that 1 million men are on the US sex offender register, a statistic that he refused to quote. Actually Theroux's documentary was my first foray into the world of internet censorship since I recall criticising his documentary in the BBC comments section, but they of course didn't publish my comment. So I responded by not paying my TV license.

Anyway, fuck knows what Alex here has against me. Presumably he doesn't like my ability to realise that if having sex with an 18 year old is OK then it is absurd to claim that sex with an 18 year old - 1 millisecond is RAPE. I don't really consider that a gifted ability though, it seems to me to be just common bloody sense!

holocaust21 wrote:
As an FYI JK I don't know if you have seen it but Louis Theroux once made a documentary entitled - I believe - "Where they put the paedophiles". It seemed a rather one-sided documentary where he visits the US and makes them all sound like horrible perverts whilst he conveniently ignores the human rights violations (keeping them locked up indefinitely without due process) and the fact that many "sexual predators" are guilty merely of kissing a 15 year old girl or asking her out on a date over the internet. Not to mention the fact that 1 million men are on the US sex offender register, a statistic that he refused to quote. Actually Theroux's documentary was my first foray into the world of internet censorship since I recall criticising his documentary in the BBC comments section, but they of course didn't publish my comment. So I responded by not paying my TV license.

Anyway, fuck knows what Alex here has against me. Presumably he doesn't like my ability to realise that if having sex with an 18 year old is OK then it is absurd to claim that sex with an 18 year old - 1 millisecond is RAPE. I don't really consider that a gifted ability though, it seems to me to be just common bloody sense!

The age of consent is 16 in the uk, so I presume that you mean if having consensual sex 1 millisecond before someone's 16th birthday is rape, I agree we need to get a sense of perspective here. What would be the effect on someone having consensual sex before 16, probably nothing. Also are you sure about the figure of 1 million British men on the US sex offenders register. This would be approximately in in every 20 adult men, seems unlikely.

I was watching 'When Louis met Jimmy' recently. Louis did very well, considering that so many people didn't get Jimmy's sense of humour.

I was quite impressed with the way Theroux kept quiet for so long after the Savile story broke, given that his generally affectionate portrait of Savile – When Louis Met Jimmy – was pretty central to most people's willingness to believe the worst. But then the plonker went ahead and made that sickening follow-up. I suppose he knows which side his bread is buttered, but I certainly hope he's not offering to make a programme about you, JK.

Also are you sure about the figure of 1 million British men on the US sex offenders register. This would be approximately in in every 20 adult men, seems unlikely.

Not British men, just men on the USA sex offender register. Just google it. Example this site: www.worldatlas.com/articles/state-by-sta...nders-in-the-us.html

If you crunch the numbers and add them all up then it comes to approx 725,000 (I was too lazy to be accurate). That's not 1 million you say. Well there are hundreds of thousands in prison too, who will later be released onto the register so when you add both up it comes close to 1 million.

Besides it's obviously going to be 1 million when it is a serious crime to do what men naturally do - have sex with young attractive women.

holocaust21 wrote:
Also are you sure about the figure of 1 million British men on the US sex offenders register. This would be approximately in in every 20 adult men, seems unlikely.

Not British men, just men on the USA sex offender register. Just google it. Example this site: www.worldatlas.com/articles/state-by-sta...nders-in-the-us.html

If you crunch the numbers and add them all up then it comes to approx 725,000 (I was too lazy to be accurate). That's not 1 million you say. Well there are hundreds of thousands in prison too, who will later be released onto the register so when you add both up it comes close to 1 million.

Besides it's obviously going to be 1 million when it is a serious crime to do what men naturally do - have sex with young attractive women.

What proportion of these crimes do you think are by people in healthy consenting relationships with older teens?

What proportion of these crimes do you think are by people in healthy consenting relationships with older teens?

Statistics on this are not published since the whole point of the sex offender registry is to maintain the feminist lie that all sex is rape.

I imagine the majority will come under one of the following categories:

1. False or exaggerated allegations
2. Consensual sex
3. Downloading illegal pornography
4. Silly allegations like "He touched my boob and it ruined my life!", even if it might have been true that he did touch her boob, it obviously shouldn't be a criminal offence

To be honest it's hard to get on the sex offender register if you've actually done something bad. Violence and murder are not registerable offences.

holocaust21 wrote:
What proportion of these crimes do you think are by people in healthy consenting relationships with older teens?

Statistics on this are not published since the whole point of the sex offender registry is to maintain the feminist lie that all sex is rape.

I imagine the majority will come under one of the following categories:

1. False or exaggerated allegations
2. Consensual sex
3. Downloading illegal pornography
4. Silly allegations like "He touched my boob and it ruined my life!", even if it might have been true that he did touch her boob, it obviously shouldn't be a criminal offence

To be honest it's hard to get on the sex offender register if you've actually done something bad. Violence and murder are not registerable offences.


55,236 on register last year reports are published by ministry of justice....

How anyway if numbers weren't published would this in anyway support or refute any "feminist lie" regarding sex?

holocaust21 wrote:
What proportion of these crimes do you think are by people in healthy consenting relationships with older teens?

Statistics on this are not published since the whole point of the sex offender registry is to maintain the feminist lie that all sex is rape.

I imagine the majority will come under one of the following categories:

1. False or exaggerated allegations
2. Consensual sex
3. Downloading illegal pornography
4. Silly allegations like "He touched my boob and it ruined my life!", even if it might have been true that he did touch her boob, it obviously shouldn't be a criminal offence

To be honest it's hard to get on the sex offender register if you've actually done something bad. Violence and murder are not registerable offences.

Touching someone's breast without consent shouldn't be a criminal offence?

Well thank goodness it is!

wyot,

55,236 on register last year reports are published by ministry of justice....

You state that as if it contradicts my statement. My numbers of 725,000 were for the USA, your numbers are for the UK. Both are roughly correct for their respective jurisdictions.

How anyway if numbers weren't published would this in anyway support or refute any "feminist lie" regarding sex?

Honey asked for my opinion, that is my opinion. It is up to the State to provide the evidence, which they will not do, precisely because those that run the State know what I say to be true and they do not want the truth to come out. Their own refusal to provide the statistics, proves what I say. As well as the fact that if you observe the majority of "sex crime" cases in the media, almost all of them (if not all of them) come under one of the categories I mentioned. I think you would struggle these days to find a single sexual offence case that does not.

honey,

Touching someone's breast without consent shouldn't be a criminal offence?

Well thank goodness it is!

Well that's just a stupid view. How much compo have you collected from all the sexual assault allegations you've made?

holocaust21 wrote:
wyot,

55,236 on register last year reports are published by ministry of justice....

You state that as if it contradicts my statement. My numbers of 725,000 were for the USA, your numbers are for the UK. Both are roughly correct for their respective jurisdictions.

How anyway if numbers weren't published would this in anyway support or refute any "feminist lie" regarding sex?

Honey asked for my opinion, that is my opinion. It is up to the State to provide the evidence, which they will not do, precisely because those that run the State know what I say to be true and they do not want the truth to come out. Their own refusal to provide the statistics, proves what I say. As well as the fact that if you observe the majority of "sex crime" cases in the media, almost all of them (if not all of them) come under one of the categories I mentioned. I think you would struggle these days to find a single sexual offence case that does not.

honey,

Touching someone's breast without consent shouldn't be a criminal offence?

Well thank goodness it is!

Well that's just a stupid view. How much compo have you collected from all the sexual assault allegations you've made?

Men are not in the habit of mauling my breasts, Holocaust, because almost all are decent and understand that this would be a violation!

Here here Honey...

Holocaust you are of course entitled to your views but in my view you undermine any arguments re compensation and false allegationsby continually denying there is any such thing aa sexual assault to either gender.

Ok you may believe that mencan do whatever they want and consent is a feminist illusion...But please refrain from calling people "stupid" who don't subscribe to this bleak view of the world...

Women have suffered sexual and other violence to lesser and greater degrees since the dawn of time and that is a terrible thing, and for the kids caught up in the homes - and it is all mainly in the home - where this cowardly and insecure behaviour occurs...

Yes - please Holo - we carry all different views here but we do insist on Good Manners (you may have noticed a recent shortage of Alex posts). Please - calm, polite, courteous.

The thing is I find honey's implication that it is quite right and good for a man to have his whole life destroyed by the police for the most silly crime of touching a woman's breasts offensive. And so I felt compelled to say something offensive in response!

And wyot, are you seriously calling touching a woman's breasts "violence"? Please do visit Syria and then let me know if you prefer being groped or having all your arms and legs blown off. I know which I'd choose! In fact, I might even pay for the former, but I certainly wouldn't pay for the latter - I wouldn't even do it if someone were to pay me!

wyot wrote:
Here here Honey...

Holocaust you are of course entitled to your views but in my view you undermine any arguments re compensation and false allegationsby continually denying there is any such thing aa sexual assault to either gender.

Ok you may believe that mencan do whatever they want and consent is a feminist illusion...But please refrain from calling people "stupid" who don't subscribe to this bleak view of the world...

Women have suffered sexual and other violence to lesser and greater degrees since the dawn of time and that is a terrible thing, and for the kids caught up in the homes - and it is all mainly in the home - where this cowardly and insecure behaviour occurs...

Thank you Wyot.

And back to the original question...
Mr King is no fool, and if anybody needs to be wary it is Theroux!