Now please correct me here, I thought you could only groom someone under 16 years and a child is under 18 years but this was a 19 year old, vulnerable, teenager.
But again here there are the muddy waters of the person saying there were sexual advances and the cop saying there were not.
Grooming and teenager are just headline grabbing really, let's pep it up a bit when I'm sure the police officer more than likely did like the girl but maybe the girl found it a bit much. Anyway link below .
www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.independent.c...-a8959876.html%3famp