You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Enter what you see:
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage Tip: Reload page if you have difficulty reading characters
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
More reasons why my convictions were unsafe PDF Print E-mail
Saturday, 07 May 2016
When we managed to prove in court that the photo the false accuser claimed I had given to him had not been taken until over three years later, it was not the difference in his age that I felt was significant, although there is a great difference between a 12 year old and a 16 year old, but I considered this not only proved he had been lying (or was mistaken as the prosecution said) but - since I had never met him and his hand drawn map of the interior of my house, like all the others, featured a door through a solid brick party wall into an imaginary extra room - how had he acquired the photo?

Since police had seized several copies of the photo when searching my house, I felt it was obvious they had provided it to the witness. Lawyers would not say or even imply that. 16 years ago police behaviour was respected and believed.

< Prev   Next >