|
|
|
Thursday, 22 May 2003 |
|
"29 WOMEN BUT NEVER ANY PROOF" - howled the SUN on Saturday about John Leslie. Well, well - so they have finally realised that celebrities provoke fantasies inspired by the nature of the publicity. I only wish my jury had understsood that. And the police say there won't be any prosecution because the claims were from so long ago - some going back ten years - and there was no forensic evidence. My claims went back 32 years and there was no evidence of any kind, let alone forensic. And the police say that, since the Matthew Kelly fiasco, they are unwilling to prosecute celebrities over historic allegations. Thanks a lot - what about me? So what happened 2 years ago is considered not fair today? And Max Clifford justifies his encouragement of Nadine Milroy - Sloan by saying, on Radio 4, that he contributed to MY convictions. Max, supporting one set of false allegations doesn't allow you to support another. You were behind the Kelly fake claims too, weren't you? Did you not have a hand in the LESLIE lies too? And the DAVID JONES ones? If the Hamiltons HAD been charged and convicted of rape, you'd be crowing with pride, wouldn't you? They would be no more guilty under those circumstances. The justice system would have gotten it wrong, as it did with me, and your moral position would have been equally suspect. Max's chickens are coming home to roost, if the tabloids can cope with their dodgy position as co-conspirators. Fascinating times. JK
|
|
