You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Enter what you see:
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage Tip: Reload page if you have difficulty reading characters
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
A tearful judge and a fraudster defendant
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: A tearful judge and a fraudster defendant

A tearful judge and a fraudster defendant 8 Months, 1 Week ago  
"When I hear about cases like this I always wonder how defence barristers morally manage defending such vile people. I could not do it"

Judge fights back tears as couple jailed over sickening abuse

Father's decade of benefit cheating

Merseyside police: Sentencing of Sandra Jones and Michael Miszczak

"Detective Chief Inspector Chris Sephton said: “The victims in this case should be commended for their bravery in coming forward and supporting the investigation. They have shown great strength in giving evidence which has resulted in the conviction and lengthy sentence that has been passed today. I hope that their determination serves as inspiration for others."

I wonder if the fraud accompanied more serious crime or taught a lesson that was stored up for future reference.
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
John Marsh

Re:A tearful judge and a fraudster defendant 8 Months, 1 Week ago  
From the Mirror
During the trial David Potter, defending Miszczak, and Bridget Bailey, defending Jones, suggested the girls were “fantasists” and had made up all the accusations.

One victim was accused of taking some of the allegations from the book ‘A Child Called It’, an account of child abuse by an American author which one of the victims was “obsessed with” as a child.

Interested to know if the prosecution provided any evidence other than the word of the complainants; who may or may not be telling the truth. And how did the jury know the complainants were not fantanists. A "fair trial" should have all this explained. In most of life now, many institutions and professionals are expected to explain how they come to their conclusions.

Maybe the defence lacked in this case. Who knows. But the UK is a very dangerous place to live from what I see. Only need to walk past a person and then be accused and then end up at a trial.
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote

Re:A tearful judge and a fraudster defendant 8 Months, 1 Week ago  
Excellent post, John Marsh, and I agree with every word.
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply