IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
I had an interesting conversation over a Dim Sum meal yesterday with a couple who have been friends for years (both, sadly, Oxford University graduates). It's my view on LIES. A lie is "something that is not true". I had a hard time convincing my friends that this does not concern or involve motive, interpretation or reason for telling a lie or printing a lie or broadcasting a lie. That is another question. Was it a mistake or misunderstanding or bad information or malicious - those questions are a totally different area. Eventually my friends were convinced but I found it disturbing that something so obvious (to me) would need explaining and justification to intelligent people.
If something is not true, it is a lie. WHY it was said or written or assumed is neither here nor there.
No I think the problem is that most people now think lies include the reason for making them (as some definitions say). But essentially a lie is an untruth (a "falsehood") and why it was made is another question. Another example of how words, like laws, have become blurred. I mean, these days many people have never even met their "friends".