http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40952224

Sarah Champion says that we have a problem with Pakistani men raping white girls. Well yes we do, that is the truth and that is what has happened. Many Pakistanis were convicted of forcing young girls into sex, this is rape. It is political correctness that prevented the serious investigations into these grooming cases for many years, now at least they are been investigated you stil have to walk on egg shells and not mention that the culprits were mainly pakistanis.

I know that many people on this site, dismiss all cases of sex abuse as false allegations, some are, but most people out there are genuine, and are not out to destroy people for nothing and gain compensation.

robbiex wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40952224

Sarah Champion says that we have a problem with Pakistani men raping white girls. Well yes we do, that is the truth and that is what has happened. Many Pakistanis were convicted of forcing young girls into sex, this is rape. It is political correctness that prevented the serious investigations into these grooming cases for many years, now at least they are been investigated you stil have to walk on egg shells and not mention that the culprits were mainly pakistanis.

I know that many people on this site, dismiss all cases of sex abuse as false allegations, some are, but most people out there are genuine, and are not out to destroy people for nothing and gain compensation.

Well, this idea of forced to quit, and there was Ken Livingston Nazi bizarre thing as well destroys any interest i may have in labour not the issues of race and discrimination but how each small thing is made into a big deal. Why can there not be a more positive amendble approach to tackling issues. Or even a comment of overstting the case or whatever.

Then Sarah Champion makes a valid point that issues such as race can hamper a investigation. BUT what I have read in the media noted here has nothing detailed to support the stance and to me that is the real issue. How did the suspects been Parkastani hinder the investigation? I see that the "loony" word will be "justified" coming out again.

Robbiex the big concern I have and I see many on this site have the same is when it comes to reported sex crime that are historic in the sense the time for evidence collection has passed then the actions of the system in these cases no longer follow "pro evidence" guidelines but "belief". Then often no one can know for certain who is the guilty party the accuser (for lying) or the accused (because the allegation did actually happen). Because the police among other parties now are following "belief" rather "pro evidence" now do not investigate often, at all other than take statements and believe. At the same time they ignore real cases that have clear evidence because belief is easier no work required. That is the concern.