cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Enter what you see:
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage Tip: Reload page if you have difficulty reading characters
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Sexual Risk Orders
#171042
holocaust21

Sexual Risk Orders 3 Weeks, 1 Day ago  
The author of our excellent false accusers database has shown a second case of a sexual risk order being issued: criticathink.wordpress.com/2018/01/01/fa...65-nikolas-crawshaw/

Surely are these not in contravention of article 5 (liberty and security) and article 6 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights?

It seems to be that the police are able to issue these willy nilly with no evidence, they've just been given powers to do whatever the fuck they like to men.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#171043
Re:Sexual Risk Orders 3 Weeks, 1 Day ago Karma: 3
It is similar to cases where parents are cleared in court of harming their children, but the social workers believe they are guilty, and so the children are taken into care.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#171049
holocaust21

Re:Sexual Risk Orders 3 Weeks, 1 Day ago  
Like what happened to this guy:



And many others. It is an absolute disgrace. He is Russian and remarks on his twitter here:

twitter.com/ESoifertis

That killers in Russia have more rights than parents in the UK. And points out that people in Russia were jailed for criticising the communist party and he has now been jailed in UK for criticising "Medway Children Services".

Child Protection = Fascism
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply