You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Enter what you see:
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage Tip: Reload page if you have difficulty reading characters
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Media coverage of trials
Media coverage of trials 9 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
Not just sex trials (the current football coach one is a bad example); media covers every gory nasty detail of the prosecution, helping it by lurid language and colour details, and hardly touches on the defence which is anyway boring (I didn't do it). Jurors go home, watch TV, get the awful side confirmed, often including tears, sobbing accounts - and return to give a guilty verdict as media has instructed them. Isn't this a disgraceful abuse of process? Not that any judges seem to care.
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Re:Media coverage of trials 9 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
Watching the footie coach trial the media angle is SO obvious. All they want is a good story. Lots of tears, misery and buggery, please.
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote

Re:Media coverage of trials 9 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
worked effectively in the Rolf Harris trial with the police false claim of 'child porn' being found on PC.
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote

Re:Media coverage of trials 9 Months, 2 Weeks ago  
It continues - word by word description of dramatic and tragic evidence from an accuser. Not a word about the cross examination. Is this right?
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply