If his suing of the BBC filming is to be granted.
Name names who tipped them off should be first.

Cliff Richard: Singer wins BBC coverage case at High Court

Great news!

It will be interesting to see if whoever tipped them off is named, but perhaps they'll still be allowed to protect their sources.

From Sir Cliff's Facebook page:

"To read the Judgement in the Sir Cliff Richard V’s the BBC Trial, and the statement read on behalf of Sir Cliff, click here:"

www.simkins.com/sir-cliff-richard-obe-v-...yp-judgment-updated/

I am very happy for him. Poor man.

I suppose we will all (bar Andrew) be footing the bill for the appeal?

Hope their appeal is a waste of taxpayers' money! Here they are arguing that naming names is a good thing as it allows additional complainants to come forward. They just don't get it, do they?!

Analysis: 'Dark day for news reporting'

Regarding the BBC's source, this is from para 34 of the judgement:

"On 9th June Mr Johnson spoke to a confidential source and received a tip-off about the police investigation into Sir Cliff. The source has not been identified, but Mr Johnson’s case is that the source was associated with (but was not part of) Operation Yewtree, though Mr Johnson said he did not know that at the time."

Who could that be?

BBC will reportedly not appeal against the Sir Cliff Richard privacy ruling ...

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6028703...-privacy-ruling.html

... because they know they are in the wrong.

Just to remind everyone now MWT has been 'exposed' Sir Clif you can see he would sell your soul to the BBC for a few pieces of 8

OMG how morally bankrupt can the BBC be?

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/08/15/bbc-...e-criminal-suspects/

They now want to change the law so Cliff couldn't have prosecuted them. Claiming they want to guarantee "free speech". This is, btw, the same BBC who are endlessly harping on about male internet trolls and celebrating when they are jailed. A bunch of ideological feminazi hypocrites. The BBC have done far more actual harm to Cliff Richard through their "free speech" than any angry disadvantaged white male can do to these extremely wealthy, powerful and privileged white feminist women.

Please chaps, don't pay your license fee. Please, just don't!

And the appalling latest "don't want to cause Cliff more distress" "Apology" - like the Munro/Ephgrave "apology" to me - cover their backs, trying to look decent; get rid of the corrupt, incompetent, useless top people, squirming with guilt. Who knows we may even see TopOfThePops uncensored again.

holocaust21 wrote:
OMG how morally bankrupt can the BBC be?

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/08/15/bbc-...e-criminal-suspects/

They now want to change the law so Cliff couldn't have prosecuted them. Claiming they want to guarantee "free speech". This is, btw, the same BBC who are endlessly harping on about male internet trolls and celebrating when they are jailed. A bunch of ideological feminazi hypocrites. The BBC have done far more actual harm to Cliff Richard through their "free speech" than any angry disadvantaged white male can do to these extremely wealthy, powerful and privileged white feminist women.

Please chaps, don't pay your license fee. Please, just don't!

Never did and never will.

Andrew you're back! Is it really you? Where have you been?

JK2006 wrote:
Andrew you're back! Is it really you? Where have you been?

And was he involved in the disappearance of a certain ITK?
Nice to see him back of course...I believe NI was his last abode?

And as Andrew told on here, a couple of years ago he was one of many people I have never met, approached by Surrey Police and asked to make false allegations against me (which he strongly refused to do).

JK2006 wrote:
And as Andrew told on here, a couple of years ago he was one of many people I have never met, approached by Surrey Police and asked to make false allegations against me (which he strongly refused to do).

That is true JK, when Surrey Police were at a dead end with me they gave up questioning me. As I have never met you and in my youth I was a big autograph collector, which I assume they meant JK seduced me and I got an autograph later.

Q.Did JK touch me ? A, He should be so bloody lucky.

And the point being Andrew; police HAVE to disclose all calls and E-Mails and totally failed to ever disclose that call to you (or to hundreds of others) never thinking you might actually tell me. This is a very serious offence - deliberately withholding evidence, whether significant or not. And then lying on oath to a Judge when trying to conceal their subterfuge. It's called Bad Faith. I'd call it Very Bad Faith. And crass stupidity. And when Chief Constables not only approve but admit it and when Police and Crime Commissioners don't even investigate, let alone challenge, that kind of behaviour - until a Judge calls them out and then pretend to be "concerned" and shocked. Extraordinary. Can such corrupt people really expect not to be fired - without huge pensions?