Barrister Matthew Scott writes:

#MarkWilliamsThomas responds to criticism. He neither admits nor denies offering to sell the names & contact details of complainants, but says that after investigation, "no offences were disclosed." He works to high standards of "confidentiality, integrity & trust."
twitter.com/Barristerblog/status/1028040437469261825/photo/1

Click the link to read Mark Williams-Thomas's response to the judge's comments in JK's trial.

If that is, indeed Mark Williams Thomas and not, as I suspect, a hoax, these are the questions I would like to put to him in reply to his comments, meant in the kindest and most sensitive way...

Please spell Jonathan correctly.
Question One - did you have any previous or current (at the time) contact with Max Clifford?
Were you involved at all in the cases of false allegations against either Paul Weller or Mick Hucknall?
Did you take the statement from the original false accuser, told to invent a celebrity by Max Clifford, in order to increase the value of his story, with another officer present, as was procedure at that time; if so who was he or she, and can they back up your account?
Could you provide written evidence regarding being told to keep your police notebooks?
Did you actually immediately give any evidence brought back from the original false accuser to Surrey Police? Or did you keep some of it in your home for several weeks? And if that was the case, why?
Should it not be FROM not FORM?
Could you please show us the document and explain the contents? Would you be happy for that document and its contents, if it exists, to become publicly available?
Are you sure there exists no other evidence that you may have been conspiring with other officers to pervert the course of justice?
Would current serving officers at Surrey Police, such as Detective Inspector Clare Loving, confirm that you never contacted them at any time after leaving Surrey Police, trying to obtain confidential information about victims, and that you never asked any officer not to tell other senior officers about your requests? And are you sure there is not evidence of some of those contacts?
Are you certain that, if any such evidence exists, it will not become available to investigators?
Will your fine and honourable work, supporting victims of crime, include bringing to justice false accusers who ruin the lives of innocent men and women? And the reputations of dead celebrities?
Which is your favourite Cliff Richard hit?

Can't answer for the others, but his favourite Cliff Richard hit will be the one his paymaster Simon Cowell says it is.

Sort of weird that he is working for the man who paid your bail money and got the job on Pop Idol thanks to your recommendation.

Stay strong JK. Hopefully the truth is coming soon.

PS: Surely if it was a hoax he would have been all over this like a rash rather then remaining completely silent.

Ahh didums I did not have a chance to defend myself.... twat

I can confirm this is Marks own reply I have it from a close ex friend of his.
The man is covering his arse it's taken days for his response and he has taken legal advice before disclosure of this statement.
You will not get anything further from him about this.

Maybe MWT wants to keep Simon Cowell as a close friend in order to investigate him.
Let's face it MWT would love to bring down another high profile star and it does come bigger than Simon.
Not that i'm saying Simon has anything to hide but he's the sort of person MWT would love to get.

new story in the Mail - MWT is outraged at judge's comments on him :

"Williams-Thomas said he ‘not been given any opportunity to defend myself’ before the judge issued her ruling, saying that he should have been. "

FFS this man now believes he should be given prior notice of a judge's ruling?

It's just laughable that he should even make such a claim. It also indicates either he has very little understanding of law or that he somehow thinks he's above it.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6051299...ntence-reopened.html

And he affords the names he tweets in advance the same ? No I do not think so.

JK2006 wrote:

Did you actually immediately give any evidence brought back from the original false accuser to Surrey Police? Or did you keep some of it in your home for several weeks?

Are you sure there exists no other evidence that you may have been conspiring with other officers to pervert the course of justice?

Would current serving officers at Surrey Police, such as Detective Inspector Clare Loving, confirm that you never contacted them at any time after leaving Surrey Police, trying to obtain confidential information about victims, and that you never asked any officer not to tell other senior officers about your requests?

And are you sure there is not evidence of some of those contacts?

Are you certain that, if any such evidence exists, it will not become available to investigators?


I suspect, dear JK, that you already know the answers to these questions. I very much look forward to seeing the answers in due course

You will get nothing from Mark voluntarily that is 100% somehow he managed to talk someone into doing a nice profile of him in 'The Sun' on the 8th just as the shit hit the fan.
Mark is trying to show on the outside all is cool but I know all is not cool Mr Cowel's people have asked what the truth is and Mark has yet to answer all the questions just those you have seen in his statement release.

This has massive damage implications for Williams-Thomas (associates) as it may impact on his talks lectures in company and private rulings he somehow gets invited to and chargers and absolute fortune some are 8k for a couple of hours down to his £600.00 per houroom he charges the ITV morning shows (600 per hour from door to door that is)

As I will state her again you will not get any more answers from Williams-Thomas even though the evidence is stacking up fast against him.

MWTW wrote:
You will get nothing from Mark voluntarily that is 100% somehow he managed to talk someone into doing a nice profile of him in 'The Sun' on the 8th just as the shit hit the fan.
Mark is trying to show on the outside all is cool but I know all is not cool Mr Cowel's people have asked what the truth is and Mark has yet to answer all the questions just those you have seen in his statement release.

This has massive damage implications for Williams-Thomas (associates) as it may impact on his talks lectures in company and private rulings he somehow gets invited to and chargers and absolute fortune some are 8k for a couple of hours down to his £600.00 per houroom he charges the ITV morning shows (600 per hour from door to door that is)

As I will state her again you will not get any more answers from Williams-Thomas even though the evidence is stacking up fast against him.

Is £600 a lot these days? If "This Morning" are daft enough to pay for an expert that isnt, good luck to him.

Actually it if you think someone has an hours travel in and out and at least an hour in studio for your 3 minute slot its not extortionate after all where would you find another expert like Mark ?

MWTW wrote:
Actually it if you think someone has an hours travel in and out and at least an hour in studio for your 3 minute slot its not extortionate after all where would you find another expert like Mark ?

It explains why they have "experts" on for two minutes without a chance to say anything. their hour must be up!

Yes I used to be the "go to" talking head on anything musical until I became a Vile Pervert, when Gambo took over. I do not miss it at all! I do rather miss my monthly Mail travel articles - mainly because they paid £1 a word and at 2000 words that was rather a nice regular income. Times have changed; I think the going rate is 1p a word.

The grandson of Carole Packham, whose murder MWT explored as his first case in The Investigator, has reacted negatively to MWT's statement:

twitter.com/neilgill_invest/status/1028036922583724034
twitter.com/neilgill_invest/status/1028604928061784065

However, under the statement which MWT posted on his Facebook page, people apparently connected with Nicola Payne, whose disappearance he has also been exploring, have posted positive comments:

"Sorry to hear this Mark. Nicola’s family know first hand that you are a man of your word. You have shown nothing but honesty and care towards us since you became involved. I hope this all resolves quickly and you can get back to what you do best-helping those in need of your expertise. X"

"I really can’t understand how they justify bringing your name into this if you were not afforded the opportunity to speak in Court. As has been said, it is an absolute travesty of Justice for you to have to clear your own name when quite clearly the correct practices have not been followed. We know from our experience as a family that not only are you a complete professional but that you are a thoroughly genuine person who takes other people’s grief as personally as if it were your own! Keep up the fantastic work that you do Mark xxx"

Correction: ... grandson of Carole Packman ...

Not afforded the chance to respond just like who mark tweets about they to do not have a chance to respond like Gambo Jim Davidson etc

Don't follow the man myself; unlike Surrey Police.

This appears to be Carole Packman's daughter's view of MWT: twitter.com/Sam_Northampton/status/1028609160483667968

This is starting to roll now she could not speak highly enough of 'MARK' in the first investigator. What has changed ?