IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Barney wrote: Only the country can decide - with all (or a lot more of) the facts.
If there were another vote, the Remain side would need to get its act together well in advance rather than imagining people would fall down in worship at another round of dull-as-dishwater facts. They'd need to win hearts and not just minds to prevent catchy Leave slogans winning the day.
Basic common sense virtually dictates that it's better to be in a club (for the better good of members) with your neighbours - than in an unregulated market, competing against them.
Particularly when the other 27 member countries are to remain in the club, assisting each other and cooperating amongst themselves - in direct and joint opposition to those just left.
People are fed up with referendums, just join the EAA and get on with it. That is the only thing that the EU will accept and will not be too catastrophic for the uk. It will still mean that we will have to put up with freedom of movement, but at the end of the day the question on the ballot paper was do you want to leave the eu, nothing about freedom of movement or anything else. It is the only thing that will honour the referendum (sort of) and not be an economic disaster. We won't have a say in the eu, but as one of 27, we don't have much say anyway.