For Hedda and others... a direct quote... www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/23-24/12 … “Child” means a person under the age of fourteen years; “young person” means a person who has attained the age of fourteen & is under the age of eighteen years. Clearly Children and Young Persons Act 1933 - never repealed a "paedophile" applies for "children" - legally those under 14.

So peedoh if under 14 and child sex offender over 14

but in reality..every single person is probably a sex offender as I bet there isn't a person that hasn't had lascivious & inappropriate thoughts.

Can't prove it of course but....

I agree hedda I doubt there is a straight male out there who have had a twinge in the nethers knowing or until knowingly clocking the body of an under 16 year old more than likely on holiday or mid summer.
I think Mr W-T has also had the thoughts and that is why he is such a big noise maker.
I bet my balls that those pesky peado hunters also get the twinge but normally about their sisters and mothers they all look like they keep it in the family.

Don't forget you're also a pedo if you ever looked at pictures of 16/17 year old Linsey Dawn Mackenzie or Samantha Fox on page 3, decades ago.

And you're probably also a pedo if you think Emma Watson is quite tasty now, because you also saw her as a kid in the Henry Potter films, you Vile Pervert.

Randall wrote:
Don't forget you're also a pedo if you ever looked at pictures of 16/17 year old Linsey Dawn Mackenzie or Samantha Fox on page 3, decades ago.

And you're probably also a pedo if you think Emma Watson is quite tasty now, because you also saw her as a kid in the Henry Potter films, you Vile Pervert.

there may be people who still have those Page 3 pix on their wall.

and what about the publisher ? (R.Murdoch)

I seem to remember a guy locked up for images including clothed ones of Emma Watson because it was said he obviously found sexual gratification looking at them.