IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
Brexit - I've just sent this to The Times...
TOPIC: Brexit - I've just sent this to The Times...
|
|
Re:Brexit - I've just sent this to The Times... 5 Years, 3 Months ago
|
|
We are, historically, a principal instagor of democracy - and introduced many global and lasting legal principles.
Magna Carta/US Constitution/Habeus Corpus etc., spring to mind - so it would be perverse to be the first to now embark on an 'are we sure' route.
We have made our bed, the people have made their views through the ballot box - essentially because a club we joined about 50 years ago is no longer fit for purpose.
Our unwritten constitution would need a major redraft to accommodate this new 'sure, are you' concept - if it was allowed to precipitate a second ballot.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Brexit - I've just sent this to The Times... 5 Years, 3 Months ago
|
|
hedda wrote:
there are several matters which really annoy me which are repeatedly ignored by Brexit promoters.
1. It was a non-binding referendum. Advisory only, No government has do something when the advice is advisory. While Treasury and other government depts advise the Government and they generally follow that advice but if that advice was found to be fraudulent or simply wrong it would be bizarre if a Government automatically followed..they are in charge for God's sake.
.
2. It has now been proved that the Brexit campaign was conducted CRIMINALLY. Now under investigation by police.
If a politician or minister is accused of criminal acts they generally stand aside while an investigation takes place.
## except it's already been proved that aspects of Brexit were conducted CRIMINALLY.
The legal ramifications if more criminal actions are found would be horrendous. Any government could face crippling financial sanctions by industry and massive lawsuits if their business suffers (which it will). In other words the tax payer looses again.
3. Nearly 2 million Brits living in Europe were denied a vote. There are around 500,000 Brits living in Australasia- still British subjects- denied a vote.
To pretend that 16/ 17 year olds - adults these days- do NOT have a dire interest in what Brexit means for them on a new world is, I say not just mean but very Non-British.
4. Quite apart from the financial ramifications and dire results predicted for British citizens (not the rich though) the claim of..
" If we have another referendum and we don't like the result...do we then have another one"...for FUCK'S SAKE...the
next referendum can be A BINDING REFERENDUM unlike the last one which was ADVISORY.
All those point have been raised and discussed and, where appropriate, voted on.
The results of the referendum became article 50 which was voted on and became law so cannot be repealed without further acts of parliament, so things have gone way beyond 'advisory'.
Whether criminally activity has been proven cannot be established until after a trial. Innocent until proven guilty, remember?
Even if proven, I think the allegations involve the way a campaign was managed and would not effect the way people voted in the referendum. They seem to be more technical than practical.
When at school, our world is influenced mainly by family and school friends. I think it's right for school leavers to have a couple of years of experience of the bigger world to allow them space to form their own 'adult' opinions, based on those personal experiences. It's not just about age.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|