IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
New Zealand mosque shootings - reactions and non-reaction
TOPIC: New Zealand mosque shootings - reactions and non-reaction
|
|
New Zealand mosque shootings - reactions and non-reaction 5 Years, 1 Month ago
|
|
So far (11:10 GMT, Friday 15 March), Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn have reacted on Twitter and the Queen by issuing a statement of condolence. Emmanuel Macron, Donald Tusk and Jean-Claude Juncker have also reacted on Twitter. But nothing on Twitter from compulsive tweeter Donald Trump. Presumably he'll react eventually, but the delay doesn't look good, especially as the shooter had apparently praised Trump in his "manifesto", saying "Trump is a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose" ( source).
Donald Trump Junior has reacted on Twitter, but without expressing sorrow/condolences, unlike May, Corbyn, Queen, etc.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:New Zealand mosque shootings - reactions and non-reaction 5 Years, 1 Month ago
|
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
I know it is the custom, but I am not really sure what all the condolences are for?
It goes without saying that decent people are upset by this.
Condolences underscore the international abhorrence and disgust about occurrences like this - and show empathy and shared views/condemnation.
And also the grief felt, by many, on the demise of great people. Indeed then, books of condolences are opened.
It is important that those representing nations, world organisations, religions - as well as the common (or famous) man - make their feelings known. Should they so wish.
Or perhaps, all should be quiet - and just say, to ourselves, that's life...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|