This Lyon cardinal was recently convicted, in the French courts, of failing to report child abuse - carried out by priests reporting to him.
Not to the civil authorities, or to Rome, it would seem; he simply covered it, and denied it happened.
Despite his wish to retire, the Pope has now refused his resignation request and wishes him to continue in his role - notwithstanding his conviction - for which he received a suspended prison sentence.
Undoubtedly, this raises serious questions - in that for the moment at least - a man who has been found guilty of sex related offences is deemed suitable to remain as France's leading catholic cleric.
Does this mean that other cardinals - at various stages of legal proceedings (in the USA, Chile and Australia for example) - will be allowed to continue in their jobs, after conviction?