A woman who has sex with men and by herself and sells the recordings says she is not a prostitute.

She can be a prostitute if she likes. I dont care.
But surely if she is selling sex in any form she is indeed a prostitute?
Why do prostitutes keep saying they are models, escorts, and reality stars?

www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/7766...stitute-buenos-aires

I wouldn't call it prostitution...but then again it possibly makes little difference in a conservative society like Argentina.

Hope you're having a good day Honey.

honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:


But surely if she is selling sex in any form she is indeed a prostitute?
Why do prostitutes keep saying they are models, escorts, and reality stars?


Wrong.............
A prostitute is someone who provides a sexual service for money. It could be a masseuse giving a happy ending or a Sugar Baby receiving an allowance or multiple other fetish type services that will involve sexual arousal. It doesn't have to be penetrative sex but it does have to involve physical involvement and payment for performing a sexual act.

Sexual content is sold by newsagents, other shop owners authors, filmakers, singers, songwriters etc etc but they are not prostitutes.

An actress or actor who receives money for appearing in a sex scene in a TV Show, movie or stage play aren't prostitutes and effectively thats what this lady was doing.

If you are criticising the use and definition of a word then I think you ought to be correct in your own definition and selling sex in any form does not constitute prostitution.

I think the definition of the word Prostitute is far more general than anything including sex. It is selling your services for predominantly financial benefit.

Blue Boy wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:


But surely if she is selling sex in any form she is indeed a prostitute?
Why do prostitutes keep saying they are models, escorts, and reality stars?


Wrong.............
A prostitute is someone who provides a sexual service for money. It could be a masseuse giving a happy ending or a Sugar Baby receiving an allowance or multiple other fetish type services that will involve sexual arousal. It doesn't have to be penetrative sex but it does have to involve physical involvement and payment for performing a sexual act.

Sexual content is sold by newsagents, other shop owners authors, filmakers, singers, songwriters etc etc but they are not prostitutes.

An actress or actor who receives money for appearing in a sex scene in a TV Show, movie or stage play aren't prostitutes and effectively thats what this lady was doing.

If you are criticising the use and definition of a word then I think you ought to be correct in your own definition and selling sex in any form does not constitute prostitution.


I was asking about it, Blue Boy, not criticising or defining. Hence the question mark.

Prostitution as far as the legal definition goes is very specific and it does refer to sexual services and only sexual services.

However the term has been corrupted and can legitimately be used to refer to someone using their skills which are respected in a manner that is not consider respectful for significant financial gain.

An example would be "Jonathan King prostituted his Cambridge university English Literature education by writing and producing novelty songs"

In my original post I was only responding to the ascertion
.....but surely if she is selling sex in any form she is indeed a prostitute?

and I stand by my comment that just because she is selling something associated with sex that in itself does not make her a prostitute

I rather like that and will have it carved on my gravestone.

JK2006 wrote:
I rather like that and will have it carved on my gravestone.

I would!