IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Whilst nervously lowering the amount of coverage, the media is still reporting on the trial; yet again Savile is only mentioned in passing. One of the False Accusers in my 2001 case revived his claims to substitute Savile's name instead of mine a few years ago; credit where due, police dropped his fantasies as they were getting dozens of similar false allegations against Savile at the time (Exposure); far more were dismissed than those publicised, as police and CPS started spotting that the vast majority were lies.
I notice the young sky news reporter who was all over this at the start of the trial has moved on to another case, I think they flit to the better current story as they see it. I do hope a TV programme can be made on this after the event.
looking at the various early photos of 'Nick' I'm awfully tempted to say the thing that sealed Oscar Wilde's fate in his trial re "too plain".
The extraordinary and seemingly ludicrous abuse claims he made to credulous coppers..is there any chance (putting on a Freud hat) that the problem is that no-one actually ever touched this lad..that he was ignored most of his young life ?
Perhaps the very opposite is true..no abuse, no interest in him, a sad and lonely boy who eventually was to re-write his life as someone so sought after that he was abused by very famous and powerful people?
An inquiry into why MET police spent so much money and resources on this charlatan is needed.
In fact, we need an inquiry into several police forces for different reasons. I am currently in contact with central government over it.
How long before they try to prevent it?
He is not unwell he is a very clever calculating person who was believed and pushed it a little to far. The world did not believed we here did not many of us pointed out the obvious an unemployed ex cop believed but now is trying to say he did not especially as there is not financial gain anymore in believing. I do hear he will not be mentioned in this trial and he has been told so, expect his head to rise above the parapet now.
MWTW wrote: He is not unwell he is a very clever calculating person who was believed and pushed it a little to far. The world did not believed we here did not many of us pointed out the obvious an unemployed ex cop believed but now is trying to say he did not especially as there is not financial gain anymore in believing. I do hear he will not be mentioned in this trial and he has been told so, expect his head to rise above the parapet now.
Oh it doesn't stop them being clever and calculating.
Cunning behaviour seems to be part of whatever this "condition" is.
To put it bluntly, Carl Beech, and a stream of other false accusers, are NOT RIGHT IN THE HEAD, and it is perfectly obvious just by looking at them.
If the police, and others who had a duty of care to them, had used a bit of common sense, a whole load of misery could have been prevented.
Absolutely Honey. A couple of my recent false accusers turned out to be obviously only after cash and compensation but one was inspired by greed on seeing the publicity about my arrest ("I've always regretted not trying this on in 2001 - now I have another chance") and the other persuaded to revive his 2002 lies by Surrey Police (she says after some persuading "he decided to go for it"). Instead of genuinely investigating and seeing the first one was obviously lying (some blatant "discrepancies" and "inconsistencies" as they put it) and the two stories between 2002 and 2015 were so totally different with the second one, police not only ignored the obvious evidence but tried to cover it up. As described by HHJ Taylor as "failure to disclose" and "misleading the court".
I believe that is at best incompetence or at worst deliberate criminality. The police behaviour is still being investigated by the authorities.