The Mail devotes its front page plus P2 to more on Carl Beech/Nick. I read the brilliant Henriques Report which identified 46 faults in the Operation Midland, the worst of which was lying to Judges to get Search Warrants. This caused me to examine Surrey Police's behaviour in Operation Ravine and to find evidence of serious, possibly even criminal behaviour. I notified Chief Constable Ephgrave (who subsequently jumped ship and is now with the Met) and PCC Munro. They ignored it. They considered this decent, normal, acceptable police behaviour. Other complaints concerned the deaths of three innocent men all fitting the CPS guidelines of Deaths In Custody. Both Surrey Police and the (then) IPCC rejected my complaints. Now the Home Secretary has become involved in the principle.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7530967...edophile-claims.html

Absolutely no part of the Inquiry will focus on errors regarding Sir Jimmy Savile, zero, nil, nothing.

It seems that large chunks of the Henriques Report are not to be published. Four chapters to be withheld...Yewtree.

Without SJS and Yewtree it seems a bit of a waste of time. I see that it's six chapters that won't be published (chapters 4 to 9).

"We do not intend to publish chapters four to nine as minimal information has previously been put into the public domain by the Met on these investigations and these chapters contain significant amounts of protected personal data about each complainant, and those they make allegations against.

The complainants provided information to the Met for the purpose of a criminal investigation and this must remain confidential. To breach this confidence would not just have an effect on these specific complainants and those who were investigated but more widely could deter victims from reporting matters to police or others from being as open and honest with police as they otherwise would be."

news.met.police.uk/news/planned-publicat...endent-review-383373

Yes despite everything they still believe that "false allegations are vanishingly rare" whereas the opposite is true; due to this approach (going from one extreme - never believing anyone - to the other) there are far more False Accusers than genuine victims. Although I do think, due to media coverage, these days someone believes they were raped if someone once gave them a peck on the cheek.