IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
Our beleaguered royalty...
TOPIC: Our beleaguered royalty...
|
|
Our beleaguered royalty... 4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
In a short few years, they've self destructed:-
Phil's car crash
His banishment to a Norfolk cottage
Harry marrying an American divorcee
Meghan's insistence to bring him to the US
What Andy's being doing, is being scrutinised
Epstein wasn't his only pal
Our next monarch might be nearly 80
And Camilla will be our gracious Queen
More consequences inevitable
With much more facts to enter the public domain
However - there's two royal weddings to look forward to...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Our beleaguered royalty... 4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
Experts say that Camilla would be 'Queen in the legal and symbolic sense'
Or even called Queen - like Charles' grandmother was
When married to King George
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Our beleaguered royalty... 4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
Meghan insisting on bringing Harry to the US?
How do we know this? Did they leave the mikes switched on?
All I see is a couple spending Christmas with one family or another, like everyone does.
Camilla will be queen whatever she calls herself and I think she will make a jolly good one.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Our beleaguered royalty... 4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Meghan insisting on bringing Harry to the US?
How do we know this? Did they leave the mikes switched on?
Our information on these two - like most Royal family matters - comes mainly from the media.
Although Harry has publically expressed a desire to live in another country - on a few occasions, in recent times.
This month, Vanity Fare, The Sun and Observer (amongst others) reported that H&M were house hunting in Malibu.
But only time will tell. And perhaps - the ongoing media coverage of Harry's uncle will affect Harry's views.
Christmas visits by the pair will be closely scrutinised; Malibu is very convenient to LAX.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Our beleaguered royalty... 4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
They are "beleaguered" because of a rampant gutter media (95% of it in the UK) who parrot, PARROT endlessly because they don't think they can be left out, they are so bloody lightweight they actually think an election is about whether you like Granddad or Loveable Buffoon ( fuck policy) and so on.
The Royals will survive.
Prince Charles will become a beloved King. Not sure what role Camila will take (she'd arther stay at home anyway).
They have to survive or Britain can say goodbye to half it's Tourism Industry.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Our beleaguered royalty... 4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
Most would agree, I think, that Meghan wants to maintain her links with the Clooney/Hollywood/Los Angels set; they attended her wedding.
And Malibu (less than 30 miles from LAX) to Frogmore (-10 miles from LHR) isn't too onerous a trek - to undertake, a few times a year.
The media would suggest that - apart from seeing Mom - there's another angle to H&M's Christmas trip, house hunting. Neither seem to be too happy here, at the moment.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Our beleaguered royalty... 4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
Barney wrote:
Most would agree, I think, that Meghan wants to maintain her links with the Clooney/Hollywood/Los Angels set; they attended her wedding.
And Malibu (less than 30 miles from LAX) to Frogmore (-10 miles from LHR) isn't too onerous a trek - to undertake, a few times a year.
The media would suggest that - apart from seeing Mom - there's another angle to H&M's Christmas trip, house hunting. Neither seem to be too happy here, at the moment.
I dont understand why it is considered a bad thing for her to maintain links with the Hollywood crowd if they are her friends? Why wouldn't she?
It doesn't make her the manipulative monster that the papers sometimes imply that she is.
If they really do feel unsupported, as reports suggest, they should just go. There is no reason for them to stay, and there are enough other minor royals who could take on some of their work, if needed.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Our beleaguered royalty... 4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
Maybe it's because - when the last American divorcee married into the Royal family - it caused a constitutional crisis.
Wallis married our King - and wished to maintain her links in Palm Springs and Manhattan; Edward and Wallis had a permanent suite at the Waldorf Astoria.
It didn't end well. Harry is a senior member of the firm, and people will expect him to do his duty. After all, the Frogmore refurbishment was funded by taxpayers.
Taxpayers also fund a large portion of his lifestyle, and that of his American wife.
Surely Harry isn't going to attempt to have it both ways - in two different countries, continents and cultures.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Our beleaguered royalty... 4 Years, 5 Months ago
|
|
Barney wrote:
Maybe it's because - when the last American divorcee married into the Royal family - it caused a constitutional crisis.
Wallis married our King - and wished to maintain her links in Palm Springs and Manhattan; Edward and Wallis had a permanent suite at the Waldorf Astoria.
It didn't end well. Harry is a senior member of the firm, and people will expect him to do his duty. After all, the Frogmore refurbishment was funded by taxpayers.
Taxpayers also fund a large portion of his lifestyle, and that of his American wife.
Surely Harry isn't going to attempt to have it both ways - in two different countries, continents and cultures.
But they are not Edward and Mrs Simpson,even if he looks exactly like him, sounds exactly like him and has the exact same mannerisms, and Meghan is the dead spit of Wallis.
They can make their own mistakes soon enough without being pre-judged for things that happened long before they were born.
Why shouldn't Harry have it both ways? If he can do good work in both places and be happy, that must be a positive thing?
We dont actually need to pay him if he is not actively working, not that I begrudge it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Our beleaguered royalty... 4 Years, 3 Months ago
|
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Meghan insisting on bringing Harry to the US?
How do we know this? Did they leave the mikes switched on?
No Honey - but so obvious.
Wrapped around M's little finger (or ambition) is H.
Godfather to Clooney's offspring next.
Maybe H doesn't know it yet!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|