IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: More Ayia Napa
|
|
More Ayia Napa 4 Years, 4 Months ago
|
|
Almost everyone, especially the woman's supporters, is saying "held for 8 hours without a lawyer - a disgrace". But surely she was meant to be a VICTIM; being interviewed as a victim; shown evidence that contradicted her account and being asked for clarification - as a victim. Victims do not need or want a lawyer present, in most cases. After enduring half an hour on each RAPIST (tea and coffee probably provided) and being shown video evidence, other witness statements, she retracts a few false claims. Then onto those she admits having had sex with. More video. Hours tick past. She starts to wish she had never started this but is still, technically, a victim. Then she decides to retract all her false claims. Wants to go home. Eight hours. Police warn her; she could be prosecuted for lying. Does she want a lawyer? No; she just wants to retract, get out of there, forget the whole thing. She'll sign anything (who cares who wrote it?).
Especially if she knows one of her victims was underage. Brits are nervous about being revealed as paedophiles.
Does this scenario sound ridiculous?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|