Well I wouldn't want you to take this seriously; it's clearly satire...

After teacher Michael Taylor was CLEARED in the "xylophone sex" case, the blonde bimbo who falsely accused him sells her story to the NOTW.

Via anyone we know?

They clearly reckon, correctly, he won't have the money or inclination to sue for libel.

Something really stinks, doesn't it? They are not even bothered that the law they praise so much has cleared him (very unusually).

Incidentally I worked for News International for a decade and you have to learn to interpret their language.

"Julianne has requested her fee for this story is given to the Children's charity Childline" can also mean "but we've decided only to give

I have just read the article. It beats me how this sort of rubbish sells papers. Boredom set in after about two paragraphs.

Interesting to note how the false accuser states she didnt want him to be charged with anything, and it only came to light when she gave a statement about another man in an unrelated incident. Do I detect a professional victim here?

If I had money to burn, I'd pay the poor guy to take legal action against the paper.

Was the story sold via anyone we know, JK? Can't imagine who would do such a thing. Some vile stoat, I suppose.

Also noteworthy that Leicester Education Authority will be meeting to review his future. Why? Is a not guilty verdict not enough?

Only just caught up with this.

The guy`s hardly going to go back into teaching is he?
And also, will inevitably move away because of the "nugde nudge no smoke without fire" brigade, who do not seem to realise they could be next.

you've said it many times before JK - the ONLY thing that matters is "is it a good story?".

Sex and xylophones beats innocence any time.