IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: Rise Of The Oestrogen
|
|
Rise Of The Oestrogen 4 Years, 2 Months ago
|
|
Why?
Is his relationship with Symonds going stale?
How many will say " No thanks. I'm married and I don't want any children from you."
Johnson to promote female MPs in cabinet reshuffle
f7td5.app.goo.gl/LyEjxv
Sent via @updayUK
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Rise Of The Oestrogen 4 Years, 2 Months ago
|
|
JK2006 wrote:
Watching Weather Forecasts for example - a field requiring very little talent of any kind, to my mind - I see these days women are vastly dominant.
Of the 13 weather presenters listed on the BBC site, 8 are men. Most of the 13 have a university degree in a scientific field and most seem to have worked for the Met Office. I imagine that their work behind the scenes will involve more than gesturing towards a map on TV.
www.bbc.com/weather/about/19119489
Disabled people seem to pop up here as the job requires so little talent it's the perfect repository for those without arms or legs thus fulfilling Politically Correct quotas.
The BBC weather presenter with one arm is apparently called Lucy Martin and she also has a relevant degree, in geography with a meteorology component.
disabilityhorizons.com/2018/01/speak-dis...esenter-lucy-martin/
Have to say that I find your constant disparaging comments about women quite offensive. This latest one about a disabled woman is a new low. Don't you realise that some of the visitors to your site are female? Some of those who sympathise with the fate of those who have been victims of false accusations are female too. Some might even be disabled.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Rise Of The Oestrogen 4 Years, 2 Months ago
|
|
Bookworm, apologies in advance if I am taking your post in the wrong way, but if it is an oblique way of saying that you consider me nasty to say that I found JK's comments about women and a disabled woman disparaging, so be it. That is simply a statement of how I feel about his frequent posts along these lines and not intended to be nasty to anyone. My only reason for describing my mental health status in another post, laying it bare, which I have only ever done once on this board before, as "Anon"/"Anonymous", and never anywhere else, was to sympathise with you. Assuming that I have interpreted your post correctly, I am now regretting going against the principle that I have held to until now never to disclose that kind of thing ever, even anonymously on discussion boards.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|