cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Enter what you see:
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage Tip: Reload page if you have difficulty reading characters
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Artist versus Artiste
#199374
Professor Verylonghair

Artist versus Artiste 1 Month, 3 Weeks ago  
What’s the difference you may ask?

Well, by way of a perfect illustration, here we go:

Think of the Beatles up to and including the day they did their last live performance on 29 August 1966. During that period of time they we’re both artists (recorded their creative output for consumption), and artistes (played live to hoards of screaming girls and noisy boys). Once they’d gotten away from the live circuit, they remained recording artists until that glorious they walked out onto the rooftop of Apple Corp in 1970 to perform “Get Back“ live.

The problem with these two words is that there isn’t a third word to describe a person or an ensemble that only make recorded output. Artists covers both scenarios, whereas artiste only covers one. I would suggest the safest course of action would be to use the word “artist” because it covers both bases, just like the music label United Artists. After all, it’s very unlikely that a famous live performer doesn’t record their music as well!

What do you think?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#199377
wyot

Re:Artist versus Artiste 1 Month, 3 Weeks ago  
I think lockdown has been going on too long for us all....
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply