I am hating the Times excerpts from this vile book; full of "sources" and "a friend" and "a Palace person" - totally made up to fit the media agenda. Exaggerate in order to make a good story into a great one and to hell with consequences. "Disfunctional family"??? I cannot think of a more functional one with patriarchs still working at 99. For God's sake, media; GROW UP!

The book will end up in bargain bins in The Works and Supermarkets. Then they will go to Poundland and eventually pulped.

JK2006 wrote:
I am hating the Times excerpts from this vile book; full of "sources" and "a friend" and "a Palace person" - totally made up to fit the media agenda. Exaggerate in order to make a good story into a great one and to hell with consequences. "Disfunctional family"??? I cannot think of a more functional one with patriarchs still working at 99. For God's sake, media; GROW UP!

I suspect that "friends" in this case are the same
five"friends" who were all given copies of an intimate letter at the same time and simultaneously and independently all decided to give it to a newspaper.

If Harry and Meghan Whatever-They-Are-Called-These-Days want to speak about their family, let them!
But do we have to have the silly charade about leaks?

all utter claptrap from a ghastly pompous "reporter" quoting (imaginary) "close friends" and "sources" and a sign of the times with the pandemic..the tabloids don't have a frigging thing to run so make all sorts of unproved claims and dills like Piers Morgan regurgitates nonsense he could have no idea is true which takes it all into another level.

Sad.

Surely it must affect the poor couple. Having to isolate in that $16Million house.