IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Lockdown was considered and rejected for the Asian flu of 1957-58.
They looked at the harms caused and decided it was worse than the virus, and would achieve nothing because the disease was already in communities and spreading. Their approach was - yes you've guessed it -just protect the vulnerable and get on with life!
We had the wisdom in 1957 and have lost it since in our shallow, media driven world.
Warning: if you think like me then this article may make you weep tears of frustration!
slightly different times..the world population has exploded and any pandemic can be far more devastating than previous ones and wipe out 100s of millions of people.
I simply sit and await to be turned into Soylent Green.
hedda wrote: slightly different times..the world population has exploded and any pandemic can be far more devastating than previous ones and wipe out 100s of millions of people.
I simply sit and await to be turned into Soylent Green.
That's the plan Hedda. WEF, NWO, Democrats, China, Tories, Labour are all in it together to reduce the population.
hedda wrote: slightly different times..the world population has exploded and any pandemic can be far more devastating than previous ones and wipe out 100s of millions of people.
Maybe.
But any such pandemic would have to be far more deadly than this one to get anywhere near 100s of millions; so this isn't relevant to my post either.
My post is about how we have reacted to C19 - not to a virus with a significant lethality.
Now they could be investigating the lab after U turn after. Democrats and the elite rigged the election. Trump knows too know much and he don't fit their agenda.
Wow...I struggle with this stuff. I just need to be left alone with my image of a man licking a dead bat in a Chinese market and causing the world to go mad. It has a pleasing narrative simplicity.