You will notice all your replies to Charlie Brooker's excellent piece on your Shipman song have been removed from the online discussion.

Yet all the insulting (and inaccurate) ones are still there.

So much for the media.
Ironic that this is an example of what you seem to be saying in the lyric.
The media censors and adapts to suit their morality and approach.

And, since new posters will be finding the references very confusing, stupid too.

Intelligent Guardianistas will instantly spot it and put 2+2 together.

I think it is the right of the general readership and contributors to the debate to be able to read the whole subtext in full , otherwise it creates a complete nonscense of asking any reader for any comments on any article.
Some of which in this case were very good, some plain silly, but it does take all sorts.

I may add to this, that obscenities were allowed in the debate, but not any comments in the long run from somebody who may or may not have been Jonathan King.

I am a Guardian reader of several years now and allowing "f" words by anonymous people is far stranger than publishing comments by any person who may or may not have left a real name, which in the case of Charlie`s original article should surely have been more relevent than a few insults anonymously typed by Mr Nobody from Nomansland.