hedda wrote:
I don;t see Andrew as being arrogant. Possibly making misjudgements though.
Remember he is reputedly the Queen's favourite.
Pretty sure the pizza event will be recorded (how long do they keep records?) and even his kids would back it up.
Now reading many readers are supporting him in the tabloids but then so many others are idiotic..many actually thinks he will be "convicted" and don;t seem to understand it's a civil action.
The threshold is lower than in a criminal case but still needs solid evidence. In the O.J.Simpson case they had physical evidence.
The Goldman family won a $60M judgement against O.J 20 years ago. They've never received a penny.
Even if this woman was to win she' would have to sue in a UK court if she wanted a financial settlement. US civil case decisions carry no weight in the UK.
I imagine any Royal has their funds so tied up in various Trusts that they could never be touched by anyone.
It seems that they destroy security records after a certain time, and they only knew about pizza express from the old calendar.
Beatrice has "no recollection" of it, so they say.
I even wondered if the stupid interview was him talking in code to someone?
Pizza express-deliver the goods?
Sweating problem- no sweat/don't worry etc? But that sounds just as far fetched as the rest of it.
As I remember it, the civil case for Simpson had no unadulterated evidence, but they carried on anyway because the whole civil action thing is a shile of pite, in my opinion.