I haven't read the latest claims by an alleged Epstein victim re that Andrew accuser but I finally read Sarah Vine's piece on it.
Of course I haven't a clue what went on or what is the truth but have always had a gut feeling the Roberts/ Guiffe allegations will end in tears..for her.
This whole case becomes more complicated by the minute with the jury matter now possibly causing Maxwell's conviction to be derailed.
And still the more fascinating story is not being told..the source of Epstein's wealth.
## Note even Vine must fall into line and state the only current acceptable description of Prince Andrew:
Oaf ??? .. he fought bravely in the Falklands War as his comrades attest
pompous ?? ..no more than any royal)
entitled? .. in what way? He did actually work very hard promoting British trade interests abroad.
If you are ancient like me you would recall a time when Prince Andrew was treated favorably by the very same tabloids for his military career and as "randy Andy" because of his long affair with Koo Stark & often pretty dates but a lifestyle no more sensational than Charles, Harry or William.
As usual Britain's media re-writes history (
it's own)
Prince Andrew is a pompous, entitled oaf - but his accuser Virginia Roberts has questions to answer too, writes SARAH VINE
www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10382...ions-answer-too.html