This latest "development" is again just another Media hype - some of us remember both parents being "persons of interest" by Portuguese police. Having been lucky enough to meet and get to know many serious villains during my 3.5 years in prison, as well as many more innocent or virtually innocent, it's obvious that if this Christian B is NOT the perpetrator he can be very helpful in finding the real perpetrators. He should be promised early release if his information helps find her or her body.

JK2006 wrote:
This latest "development" is again just another Media hype - some of us remember both parents being "persons of interest" by Portuguese police. Having been lucky enough to meet and get to know many serious villains during my 3.5 years in prison, as well as many more innocent or virtually innocent, it's obvious that if this Christian B is NOT the perpetrator he can be very helpful in finding the real perpetrators. He should be promised early release if his information helps find her or her body.

Not if he is prone to raping people, thanks!

Honey wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
This latest "development" is again just another Media hype - some of us remember both parents being "persons of interest" by Portuguese police. Having been lucky enough to meet and get to know many serious villains during my 3.5 years in prison, as well as many more innocent or virtually innocent, it's obvious that if this Christian B is NOT the perpetrator he can be very helpful in finding the real perpetrators. He should be promised early release if his information helps find her or her body.

Not if he is prone to raping people, thanks!

I agree Honey, any one sexually assualts any one or murders needs to be put down. (Strong evidence of course )

Green Man wrote:
[quote]Honey wrote:
[quote]JK2006 wrote:


I agree Honey, any one sexually assualts any one or murders needs to be put down. (Strong evidence of course )

Strong evidence; therein lies a thousand interpretations GM.

I get that cctv & dna in combination would be. But what about everything in between? And the definition of "strong" would forever be hostage to political whim. It would in this fickle world expand to respond to every new moral outrage.

Not in my name, as they say, I'm afraid. Or I would be as "bad" as the ones we put down, and happened to get it right.

Wyot wrote:
[quote]Green Man wrote:
[quote]Honey wrote:
JK2006 wrote:


I agree Honey, any one sexually assualts any one or murders needs to be put down. (Strong evidence of course )

Strong evidence; therein lies a thousand interpretations GM.

I get that cctv & dna in combination would be. But what about everything in between? And the definition of "strong" would forever be hostage to political whim. It would in this fickle world expand to respond to every new moral outrage.

Not in my name, as they say, I'm afraid. Or I would be as "bad" as the ones we put down, and happened to get it right.

CCTV and DNA is strong evidence to hang someone but that's more than enough.

Surely if you're slightly bright you obtain someone else's DNA after committing a murder from a passing bin and leave it at the site? And as that brilliant GUARDIAN commercial showed years ago, the camera CAN lie.

JK2006 wrote:
Surely if you're slightly bright you obtain someone else's DNA after committing a murder from a passing bin and leave it at the site? And as that brilliant GUARDIAN commercial showed years ago, the camera CAN lie.

What if you shot someone or someone to death on CCTV, the murderer has his mug exposed ?

Depends on the angle, the edit, the lighting, everything that may or may not be seen. Self defence? Two people with guns but only one on camera? There are literally dozens of possibilities - not just the one obvious one. Just like not believing media simplicity. Sometimes neither extreme is correct.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1077612...aving-sex-woman.html

'A Madeline McCann case investigator thinks police are after the wrong man
Last month jailed paedophile Christian Brueckner was named as a chief suspect
Mark Williams-Thomas says his evidence blows police's claims to 'smithereens'

It appears MWT has moved on from Saville!

F wrote:
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1077612...aving-sex-woman.html

'A Madeline McCann case investigator thinks police are after the wrong man
Last month jailed paedophile Christian Brueckner was named as a chief suspect
Mark Williams-Thomas says his evidence blows police's claims to 'smithereens'

It appears MWT has moved on from Saville!

No. He has always been circling the McCanns like a vulture.
He published the biggest load of tripe I have yet seen about about the case, without troubling himself to have a look at the facts first, and called the parents and both police forces liars.

Mark Williams Thomas. His day of glory will come.