IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
Don't you just love the Depp/Heard fiasco?
TOPIC: Don't you just love the Depp/Heard fiasco?
|
|
Re:Don't you just love the Depp/Heard fiasco? 1 Year, 10 Months ago
|
|
Honey wrote:
Green Man wrote:
I saw Ted Nugent being interviewed by Mark Steyn on GB News last night. Ted, is only a few years younger than Biden.
He has a new album out in a week or so away, upcoming tour in USA and he still can construct verbal sentences. (No teleprompter for the Nugent)
Depp and Biden have never embraced the outdoors nor been drug free. Nugent drinks red wine occasionally but never did or do any other drugs.
Ted Nugent looks great, but there is a massive difference between 73 and 79, because as you get older you age faster.
I think Depp is going to lose the case, despite Amber Heard trying her best to win it for him.
5 years is not massive difference Honey. I knew people in their 80s who had the same energy and enthusiasm to those in their 30s.
Clean living, exercise, outdoor life, even walking is good on mental health.
Ted Nugent left Amboy Dukes because of the negative attitude and drugs the band were taking. It wasn't Ted's scene so he stayed away from music and stage to spend time in the woods to think about a new direction.
If see Ted Nugent interviews in the 1980s etc he still has the same views, energy and his concerts are still great.
Little Miss Dangerous is to me is Nugent weakest album out off his catalogue. He made it up though by doing If You Can't Lick 'Em...Lick 'Em album.
Depp and Herd look like 2 very toxic people who actually deserve one another. Hollywood is not dubbed Hollyweird for nothing.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Don't you just love the Depp/Heard fiasco? 1 Year, 10 Months ago
|
|
Honey wrote:
[quote] Green Man wrote:
I think Depp is going to lose the case, despite Amber Heard trying her best to win it for him.
I think you are right Honey. She only has to show that she was justified in alluding to him being domestically violent as he is suing her for defamation. It actually doesn't matter if she was violent as well.
The number of incidents that happened with his staff around as well that no one is refuting as a witness. Quite what he is doing (legally), I don't understand.
But these superstars can go a little bonkers, can't they...?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|